Juan manuel marquez aka el dinamita army

[Snakey]

Well if you saw someone murdered and the judge said the person who did it was not guilty does it mean that person didnt murder someone?


A bunch of people saw Marquez win those two fights, just coz some judges say otherwise doesnt mean it didnt happen.

[FinitoElDinamita]

OJ simpson is innocent because the judge said so.

[fan johnny]

OJ simpson is innocent because the judge said so.

OJ was declared innocent by a Jury, not because the Judge said so. Marquez lost the second fight because two of the three Judges said so. That is just a fact, not an opinion. I've watched both fights and I can honestly say that in my opinion they can both be called draws.

[FinitoElDinamita]

OJ simpson is innocent because the judge said so.

OJ was declared innocent by a Jury, not because the Judge said so. Marquez lost the second fight because two of the three Judges said so. That is just a fact, not an opinion. I've watched both fights and I can honestly say that in my opinion they can both be called draws.

Oj is innocent because the jury said so.. like that makes any difference.

U should learn how to score a fight properly. Do u live and by these judges scorecard. Smh

[InTheNeutralCorner]

OJ simpson is innocent because the judge said so.

OJ was declared innocent by a Jury, not because the Judge said so. Marquez lost the second fight because two of the three Judges said so. That is just a fact, not an opinion. I've watched both fights and I can honestly say that in my opinion they can both be called draws.

There you go.

Opinion: Some (we don't even know how many) believe that Marquez won both fights.
Fact: Draw and a win for Pacquiao based on the official judges scoring and recorded in the books.

Opinion is disputable, Fact isn't.

[:::PSL:::]

OJ simpson is innocent because the judge said so.

OJ was declared innocent by a Jury, not because the Judge said so. Marquez lost the second fight because two of the three Judges said so. That is just a fact, not an opinion. I've watched both fights and I can honestly say that in my opinion they can both be called draws.

You have to forgive him. He's not the sharpest tool in the shed.

[FinitoElDinamita]

OJ simpson is innocent because the judge said so.

OJ was declared innocent by a Jury, not because the Judge said so. Marquez lost the second fight because two of the three Judges said so. That is just a fact, not an opinion. I've watched both fights and I can honestly say that in my opinion they can both be called draws.

You have to forgive him. He's not the sharpest tool in the shed.

Trust me, you are nowhere near my level when it comes to intelligence or boxing knowledge.

I know many of you pactards never graduated high school but try to stay on point, lil man.

Whether it was the judge or the jury is not important. The point is, OJ is guilty and he was able to get away with it.

You guys are bums. lol Stop living your dreams through one man.

[Dia bando]

OJ simpson is innocent because the judge said so.

OJ was declared innocent by a Jury, not because the Judge said so. Marquez lost the second fight because two of the three Judges said so. That is just a fact, not an opinion. I've watched both fights and I can honestly say that in my opinion they can both be called draws.

You have to forgive him. He's not the sharpest tool in the shed.

Trust me, you are nowhere near my level when it comes to intelligence or boxing knowledge.

I know many of you pactards never graduated high school but try to stay on point, lil man.

Whether it was the judge or the jury is not important. The point is, OJ is guilty and he was able to get away with it.

You guys are bums. lol Stop living your dreams through one man.

The two fights I gave to JMM, it's just what I think?

[InTheNeutralCorner]

OJ simpson is innocent because the judge said so.

OJ was declared innocent by a Jury, not because the Judge said so. Marquez lost the second fight because two of the three Judges said so. That is just a fact, not an opinion. I've watched both fights and I can honestly say that in my opinion they can both be called draws.

You have to forgive him. He's not the sharpest tool in the shed.

Trust me, you are nowhere near my level when it comes to intelligence or boxing knowledge.

I know many of you pactards never graduated high school but try to stay on point, lil man.

Whether it was the judge or the jury is not important. The point is, OJ is guilty and he was able to get away with it.

You guys are bums. lol Stop living your dreams through one man.

The two fights I gave to JMM, it's just what I think?

And there is nothing wrong with that. A close fight can go to either fighter. Anyone who insists that Pacquiao or Marquez convincingly won should be able to back it up objectively.

[LobowolfXXX]

As far as the legal analogy, just because you did the act doesn't make you 'guilty' (as a legal term af art).


As far as MP-JMM I and II, obviously, a lot of people thought differently about who won the first two fights. I don't know that there was an overwhelming consensus either way. I did a Google search and found an article that reported a survey of 80 'experts' and it was 38-33 with 9 draws for Pacqiao (second fight), but it didn't source the survey or name the experts. All of the ESPN panel had it for Marquez by one point. Whatever you thought about either fight, several credible experts agreed with you.

[Dia bando]

As far as the legal analogy, just because you did the act doesn't make you 'guilty' (as a legal term af art).


As far as MP-JMM I and II, obviously, a lot of people thought differently about who won the first two fights. I don't know that there was an overwhelming consensus either way. I did a Google search and found an article that reported a survey of 80 'experts' and it was 38-33 with 9 draws for Pacqiao (second fight), but it didn't source the survey or name the experts. All of the ESPN panel had it for Marquez by one point. Whatever you thought about either fight, several credible experts agreed with you.

Expert's we are all Expert's here.

[InTheNeutralCorner]

Well if you saw someone murdered and the judge said the person who did it was not guilty does it mean that person didnt murder someone?


A bunch of people saw Marquez win those two fights, just coz some judges say otherwise doesnt mean it didnt happen.

How many in numbers is that 'bunch'?

And how did you see both fights: are they close or was one of them dominant?