As an aside, neither the judge nor the jury said, "OJ is innocent." "Not guilty" is not the same thing as innocent. It means that it wasn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt - the highest standard of proof. Every single juror could have thought OJ did it and still vote not guilty. Still had to vote not guilty, if they thought that yeah, he did it, but the proof wasn't convincing enough. NOBODY (whose opinion mattered as far as what happened to OJ) said he was "innocent."