Not a ROBBERY Please look :D

[InTheNeutralCorner]

Rounds 2 through to 5 were obviously for Marquez. Going into the second half he was up 4-2. You could make a claim for it being 5-1 if you edge the first to Marquez.

ElTerribleMorales obviously missed that. He gave round 4 to Pac.

Round 4: Pacquiao, finally starts throwing more and landing the left, Marquez lands a couple nice right counters but is out worked and out landed

the mere fact that Miron is trying to give the 2nd round a clear cut round for Marque to Manny just proves that all of you fanboys are just reaching for everyone to accept the bullshit that Manny got the nod, it's as simple as this, Manny never landed anything as cleanly or as sharply as Marquez did, and Marquez landed and he did so often

I don't think any Pac fanboy here is trying to convince anyone that Manny clearly won the fight. As you can see, noone is even gloating from that win. As I have said before, it is a very close fight that could have gone either way. It's the claim of robbery that miron_lang came up with what seems to be a compelling reason as to why it is not.

In a very close fight, the bias will definitely show. And I agree that there is a bias in the way a judge scored it hugely in Pac's favor.