Not a ROBBERY Please look :D

[Beanz]

Finally got the fight. Ive seen the first 3 rounds and definately PAC won 1 and 3. and good claim at round 2 as well.


Pugilistic

since no one among the 5 of you gave round 3 to PAC are you willing to debate with me that Pacquiao won round 3? lets make a thread about it.

I am watching ROUND 3 right now for the 2nd time and IMO it is a CLEAR ROUND for Pacquiao.

Surely you are jesting. You had the temerity to post a thread flying in the face of majority opinion,common sense,and public indignation from a position of extreme ignorance having not even watched the fight? !!! like Bilbo who watched it on a mobile and then cherry picked so called boxing experts based on them supporting his very weak argument.You have no right to air any opinion if all you are basing it on is other peoples posts. Really you are clutching at straws. It seems you, Fenster and Bilbo think that agreeing with the majority will undermine some mythical kudos and so to underline your specialness you have to disagree with reality.
Re: Not a ROBBERY Please look

Greenbeanz


ROBBERIES = FIGHT you CLEARLY WON but was AWARDED TO THE OTHER FIGHTER


IF 9 Potential rounds are there for Pacquiao to claim then this is not a robbery. I thought that was simple enough.

you are correct JMM clearly won. Nobody gave Pacquiao 9 rounds. NOBODY. ZILCH. ZERO. tHe most given to him by the super 5 was 5 three gave him 4 rounds and one only 2.
So i may be a little rusty on maths but to get an average using your logic 5 posts over 12 rounds equals 60 rounds. the 5 posts gave Pacquiao a total of 20 rounds. thats 20 out of 60 one third. one third of 12 rounds is 4. 4 rounds not 9.There is never in any scenario 9 potential rounds for Pacquiao only 4 at most. The problem is your logic is not simple it requires the universe to be turned on it's head. Being given a win in such a manner is not only bad for boxing it is bad for Manny. It tarnishes his career it puts into question other results so even Pac fanboys should be and are disappointed. I was not rooting for any particular fighter like many i called it as i saw it. So before you start accusing people of bias maybe you should look in the mirror. Robbery.FACT, FACT nailed on, indisputable,Mutha**ckin FACT

[Fenster]

Greenbeanz, I haven't even said who I thought won. So for the record - I think Marquez won. That makes him 3-0 over Pac in my book.

However, not ONE single fight was a ROBBERY and I scored the 2nd fight widest of all. Fact.

[Gandalf]

Greenbeanz, I haven't even said who I thought won. So for the record - I think Marquez won. That makes him 3-0 over Pac in my book.

However, not ONE single fight was a ROBBERY and I scored the 2nd fight widest of all. Fact.

Fenster, I would like to see how you scored the fight.

[Fenster]

Greenbeanz, I haven't even said who I thought won. So for the record - I think Marquez won. That makes him 3-0 over Pac in my book.

However, not ONE single fight was a ROBBERY and I scored the 2nd fight widest of all. Fact.

Fenster, I would like to see how you scored the fight.

I don't ever write down rd-by-rds (unless I specifically rewatch a fight for something). I just ENJOY the contest.

I thought it could have gone either way with Marquez edging it. Numbers are utterly irrelevant for someone coming from my rational position. Who won means nothing to me. Reverse the decision and I will argue the EXACT same thing. NO robbery.

[generalbulldog]

Miles you are anything but impartial when evaluating fighters you don't like. I remember the Amir Khan-Marcos Maidana fight where you screamed bloody robbery that Khan got the win. And we all know how much you like Khan?

The same applies here with Pacquiao.

[Gandalf]

Miles you are anything but impartial when evaluating fighters you don't like. I remember the Amir Khan-Marcos Maidana fight where you screamed bloody robbery that Khan got the win. And we all know how much you like Khan?

The same applies here with Pacquiao.

I screamed bloody robbery that Khan had got the win? Only on re watching surely. I think I have deflated your argument.

[Gandalf]

Less flippantly though, I know when a fighter wins a fight. I will give Khan the Maidana fight which was a close fight in the end, but Khan did do enough AND had a KD. This fight had none of that, nobody was hurt and I was able to just sit back and enjoy it. There was no fighter eating up rounds with activity and hitting gloves. Manny seemed half asleep and that makes it so much easier to give rounds to Marquez who really was so much sharper.

Totally different fights really.

[generalbulldog]

Miles you are anything but impartial when evaluating fighters you don't like. I remember the Amir Khan-Marcos Maidana fight where you screamed bloody robbery that Khan got the win. And we all know how much you like Khan?

The same applies here with Pacquiao.

I screamed bloody robbery that Khan had got the win? Only on re watching surely. I think I have deflated your argument.

Actually no. This proves my statement. Miles, you screamed robbery at the fighter you disliked that wins a close decision. Well to be fair, a lot of boxing fans do that also. But come on, to present yourself as some fair and impartial guy.

[Gandalf]

Miles you are anything but impartial when evaluating fighters you don't like. I remember the Amir Khan-Marcos Maidana fight where you screamed bloody robbery that Khan got the win. And we all know how much you like Khan?

The same applies here with Pacquiao.

I screamed bloody robbery that Khan had got the win? Only on re watching surely. I think I have deflated your argument.

Actually no. This proves my statement. Miles, you screamed robbery at the fighter you disliked that wins a close decision. Well to be fair, a lot of boxing fans do that also. But come on, to present yourself as some fair and impartial guy.

No, once again you are being silly.

I have said all along that we can readily erase my own viewpoint if need be and evaluate only the viewpoints of others.

I am not the judge and jury, I am more than happy to allow my scorecard to fall by the wayside. However, it seems that others will only take its place.