Not a ROBBERY Please look :D

[Gandalf]

Miles you are anything but impartial when evaluating fighters you don't like. I remember the Amir Khan-Marcos Maidana fight where you screamed bloody robbery that Khan got the win. And we all know how much you like Khan?

The same applies here with Pacquiao.

I screamed bloody robbery that Khan had got the win? Only on re watching surely. I think I have deflated your argument.

[Gandalf]

Less flippantly though, I know when a fighter wins a fight. I will give Khan the Maidana fight which was a close fight in the end, but Khan did do enough AND had a KD. This fight had none of that, nobody was hurt and I was able to just sit back and enjoy it. There was no fighter eating up rounds with activity and hitting gloves. Manny seemed half asleep and that makes it so much easier to give rounds to Marquez who really was so much sharper.

Totally different fights really.

[generalbulldog]

Miles you are anything but impartial when evaluating fighters you don't like. I remember the Amir Khan-Marcos Maidana fight where you screamed bloody robbery that Khan got the win. And we all know how much you like Khan?

The same applies here with Pacquiao.

I screamed bloody robbery that Khan had got the win? Only on re watching surely. I think I have deflated your argument.

Actually no. This proves my statement. Miles, you screamed robbery at the fighter you disliked that wins a close decision. Well to be fair, a lot of boxing fans do that also. But come on, to present yourself as some fair and impartial guy.

[Gandalf]

Miles you are anything but impartial when evaluating fighters you don't like. I remember the Amir Khan-Marcos Maidana fight where you screamed bloody robbery that Khan got the win. And we all know how much you like Khan?

The same applies here with Pacquiao.

I screamed bloody robbery that Khan had got the win? Only on re watching surely. I think I have deflated your argument.

Actually no. This proves my statement. Miles, you screamed robbery at the fighter you disliked that wins a close decision. Well to be fair, a lot of boxing fans do that also. But come on, to present yourself as some fair and impartial guy.

No, once again you are being silly.

I have said all along that we can readily erase my own viewpoint if need be and evaluate only the viewpoints of others.

I am not the judge and jury, I am more than happy to allow my scorecard to fall by the wayside. However, it seems that others will only take its place.

[generalbulldog]

Miles you are anything but impartial when evaluating fighters you don't like. I remember the Amir Khan-Marcos Maidana fight where you screamed bloody robbery that Khan got the win. And we all know how much you like Khan?

The same applies here with Pacquiao.

I screamed bloody robbery that Khan had got the win? Only on re watching surely. I think I have deflated your argument.

Actually no. This proves my statement. Miles, you screamed robbery at the fighter you disliked that wins a close decision. Well to be fair, a lot of boxing fans do that also. But come on, to present yourself as some fair and impartial guy.

No, once again you are being silly.

I have said all along that we can readily erase my own viewpoint if need be and evaluate only the viewpoints of others.

I am not the judge and jury, I am more than happy to allow my scorecard to fall by the wayside. However, it seems that others will only take its place.

And pray tell, how many were really unbiased? I know someone like Andre really has no vested interest or hate for both fighters and think JMM truly won. I know Youngblood felt JMM also won. That I can respect. But then there are also a lot of people that already didn't like Pac to begin with such as yourself and your fellow Korean countryman like finitodynamita or whatever you spell it. Or people that blasted Pac in the 1st place as a fraud and cherry picker before the fight, all of a sudden are people that are impartial and unbiased when it comes to a close fight between Pac-JMM? Laughable.

BTW, I also have to add there are people that are slanted in both ways, obviously people like PSL and Miron_Lang are going to be biased in favor of Pac but then so is the other side. To really cast the majority of one side as some impartial and fair evaluator is funny. That is all.

[Gandalf]

Miles you are anything but impartial when evaluating fighters you don't like. I remember the Amir Khan-Marcos Maidana fight where you screamed bloody robbery that Khan got the win. And we all know how much you like Khan?

The same applies here with Pacquiao.

I screamed bloody robbery that Khan had got the win? Only on re watching surely. I think I have deflated your argument.

Actually no. This proves my statement. Miles, you screamed robbery at the fighter you disliked that wins a close decision. Well to be fair, a lot of boxing fans do that also. But come on, to present yourself as some fair and impartial guy.

No, once again you are being silly.

I have said all along that we can readily erase my own viewpoint if need be and evaluate only the viewpoints of others.

I am not the judge and jury, I am more than happy to allow my scorecard to fall by the wayside. However, it seems that others will only take its place.

And pray tell, how many were really unbiased? I know someone like Andre really has no vested interest or hate for both fighters and think JMM truly won. I know Youngblood felt JMM also won. That I can respect. But then there are also a lot of people that already didn't like Pac to begin with such as yourself and your fellow Korean countryman like finitodynamita or whatever you spell it. Or people that blasted Pac in the 1st place as a fraud and cherry picker before the fight, all of a sudden are people that are impartial and unbiased when it comes to a close fight between Pac-JMM? Laughable.

BTW, I also have to add there are people that are slanted in both ways, obviously people like PSL and Miron_Lang are going to be biased in favor of Pac but then so is the other side. To really cast the majority of one side as some impartial and fair evaluator is funny. That is all.

So, anyone who has criticized Pac in the past has no right to score the fight? Fair enough, erase my scorecard. But nobody who has scored Marquez winning has done so by NOT WATCHING THE FIGHT TO BEGIN WITH, that is insane. Most of us watched and in its entirety. Not any evaluation on the basic framework of the people who scored it for Marquez.

That is even more outrageous and where this thread started. People can criticise my card, but if YOU take issue with it then call me out on where you take issue. But don't just be a dick and try and provoke without actually giving any verdict of your own.

That is just trolling.

[armyash]

you chose 5 of us who scored a win for JMM - There's a huge clue there!!

[Gandalf]

you chose 5 of us who scored a win for JMM - There's a huge clue there!!

It's like The DaVinci Code isn't it?

Exclude all the haters to get the right score and thus get the key to move onto the next level.

[miron_lang]

you chose 5 of us who scored a win for JMM - There's a huge clue there!!

Those are the only 5 that has a round by round score. Look at that thread and review it.

Look at the time stamps.

There's no hidden agenda here. These are simple facts that everybody must consider and not let their emotions rule them.

[generalbulldog]

Miles you are anything but impartial when evaluating fighters you don't like. I remember the Amir Khan-Marcos Maidana fight where you screamed bloody robbery that Khan got the win. And we all know how much you like Khan?

The same applies here with Pacquiao.

I screamed bloody robbery that Khan had got the win? Only on re watching surely. I think I have deflated your argument.

Actually no. This proves my statement. Miles, you screamed robbery at the fighter you disliked that wins a close decision. Well to be fair, a lot of boxing fans do that also. But come on, to present yourself as some fair and impartial guy.

No, once again you are being silly.

I have said all along that we can readily erase my own viewpoint if need be and evaluate only the viewpoints of others.

I am not the judge and jury, I am more than happy to allow my scorecard to fall by the wayside. However, it seems that others will only take its place.

And pray tell, how many were really unbiased? I know someone like Andre really has no vested interest or hate for both fighters and think JMM truly won. I know Youngblood felt JMM also won. That I can respect. But then there are also a lot of people that already didn't like Pac to begin with such as yourself and your fellow Korean countryman like finitodynamita or whatever you spell it. Or people that blasted Pac in the 1st place as a fraud and cherry picker before the fight, all of a sudden are people that are impartial and unbiased when it comes to a close fight between Pac-JMM? Laughable.

BTW, I also have to add there are people that are slanted in both ways, obviously people like PSL and Miron_Lang are going to be biased in favor of Pac but then so is the other side. To really cast the majority of one side as some impartial and fair evaluator is funny. That is all.

So, anyone who has criticized Pac in the past has no right to score the fight? Fair enough, erase my scorecard. But nobody who has scored Marquez winning has done so by NOT WATCHING THE FIGHT TO BEGIN WITH, that is insane. Most of us watched and in its entirety. Not any evaluation on the basic framework of the people who scored it for Marquez.

That is even more outrageous and where this thread started. People can criticise my card, but if YOU take issue with it then call me out on where you take issue. But don't just be a dick and try and provoke without actually giving any verdict of your own.

That is just trolling.

Trolling nah. I just call it what it is. I'm a dick? Whatever man. To me it's just sports nothing personal. I'm not that emotionally vested in who wins tbh. Nor do I need to call people names like "dick" because they gave different opinions. And yes I had JMM winning by a round.

[Beanz]

Miles you are anything but impartial when evaluating fighters you don't like. I remember the Amir Khan-Marcos Maidana fight where you screamed bloody robbery that Khan got the win. And we all know how much you like Khan?

The same applies here with Pacquiao.

I screamed bloody robbery that Khan had got the win? Only on re watching surely. I think I have deflated your argument.

Actually no. This proves my statement. Miles, you screamed robbery at the fighter you disliked that wins a close decision. Well to be fair, a lot of boxing fans do that also. But come on, to present yourself as some fair and impartial guy.

No, once again you are being silly.

I have said all along that we can readily erase my own viewpoint if need be and evaluate only the viewpoints of others.

I am not the judge and jury, I am more than happy to allow my scorecard to fall by the wayside. However, it seems that others will only take its place.

And pray tell, how many were really unbiased? I know someone like Andre really has no vested interest or hate for both fighters and think JMM truly won. I know Youngblood felt JMM also won. That I can respect. But then there are also a lot of people that already didn't like Pac to begin with such as yourself and your fellow Korean countryman like finitodynamita or whatever you spell it. Or people that blasted Pac in the 1st place as a fraud and cherry picker before the fight, all of a sudden are people that are impartial and unbiased when it comes to a close fight between Pac-JMM? Laughable.

BTW, I also have to add there are people that are slanted in both ways, obviously people like PSL and Miron_Lang are going to be biased in favor of Pac but then so is the other side. To really cast the majority of one side as some impartial and fair evaluator is funny. That is all.

So you respect only two people and everyone else is biased. Well you yourself sir are always accusing Brit/Hatton fans as being unable to be rational and impartial and i for one take that as a slur and an insult. How very dare you. You sit there with your impregnable air of detached superiority looking down on us mere mortals for becoming emotionally involved in a bout of fisticuffs, and then presume to deduct the allegiances of every person, pre fight from our post fight comments. Seriously though don't turn a desperate, badly made argument, from an ill informed massively biased poster into some excuse to settle personal scores with miles and disrespect every other person posting on this thread, by assuming we all didn't like pac to begin with.