
Originally Posted by
miles

Originally Posted by
generalbulldog

Originally Posted by
miles

Originally Posted by
generalbulldog
Miles you are anything but impartial when evaluating fighters you don't like. I remember the Amir Khan-Marcos Maidana fight where you screamed bloody robbery that Khan got the win. And we all know how much you like Khan?
The same applies here with Pacquiao.

I screamed bloody robbery that Khan had got the win? Only on re watching surely. I think I have deflated your argument.
Actually no. This proves my statement. Miles, you screamed robbery at the fighter you disliked that wins a close decision. Well to be fair, a lot of boxing fans do that also. But come on, to present yourself as some fair and impartial guy.
No, once again you are being silly.
I have said all along that we can readily erase my own viewpoint if need be and evaluate only the viewpoints of others.
I am not the judge and jury, I am more than happy to allow my scorecard to fall by the wayside. However, it seems that others will only take its place.
And pray tell, how many were really unbiased? I know someone like Andre really has no vested interest or hate for both fighters and think JMM truly won. I know Youngblood felt JMM also won. That I can respect. But then there are also a lot of people that already didn't like Pac to begin with such as yourself and your fellow Korean countryman like finitodynamita or whatever you spell it. Or people that blasted Pac in the 1st place as a fraud and cherry picker before the fight, all of a sudden are people that are impartial and unbiased when it comes to a close fight between Pac-JMM? Laughable.
BTW, I also have to add there are people that are slanted in both ways, obviously people like PSL and Miron_Lang are going to be biased in favor of Pac but then so is the other side. To really cast the majority of one side as some impartial and fair evaluator is funny. That is all.
Bookmarks