Not a ROBBERY Please look :D

[Beanz]

yes it was a close fight but it was clearly a victory for Marquez. That is possible, for it to be close but still be clear who the winner was. And in my eyes even if it was by 1 round, Marquez still clearly won it. So that makes it a robbery.

I don't agree with that. If it's close it means it can go either way.

If someone sees ONE round different there is a different result.

You're basically claiming your scorecard is 100% bombproof correct. Indisputable.

Even if loads of people "only" gave Pacquiao a draw that means he didn't LOSE. So how can it possibly be a robbery? Madness.

Fair enough.

There's still no explaining Trougridges 'professional' scoring,that made Juan need a ko after the tenth.

That type of scoring is for a Pac MArgaretto kind of fight not one this close and that is a fight that proves Manny wasnt connecting hard in this last fight.

Look at the visual comparison and you know Manny was getting scored for sparring non contact.

I'm not sure what's wrong with Trowbridge's scorecard?

He gave Marquez rounds 4, 5, 7 and 12. Cutmemick and Elterrible gave Pac round 4, CutMemick gave Pac round 5, Miles gave Pac round 7 and CutMemick and Elterrible gave Pac round 12.

Theoretically, if Trowbridge had seen those rounds the same way these particular forum members did, then Pac wins 120-108.

This is hilarious.

Theoretically......IF......The FACT is Trowbridge's scoring was ridiculous enough as it is. Using the scorecards of those who had Marquez winning to increase the winning margin on an already lunatic scorecard in favour of Pacquiao is nonsensical. It ain't Hilarious.

[Beanz]

I give up

[Fenster]

It's hilarious to me.

LobowolfXXX - list some universally recognised "robberies?" I'd be surprised if any genuine "robberies" have such disagreement on the winner of the rounds.

For example - Lewis-Holyfield 1 round 5. Now EVERYONE saw Lewis totally dominate this round, it was borderline a 10-8 round, yet Eugenia Williams scored it for Holyfield.

Now that's what you call corruption/inept/wrong. She went against the opinion of MILLLIONS!!! Which needed an explanation.

Pac-Marquez 3 doesn't have any rounds like this.

[Gandalf]

Clearly it does have obvious rounds, as there appears to be an obvious pattern if you are willing to go beyond the opinions of just the 5 Saddo's posters. There is a general pattern of the rounds people are giving to Manny and to Marquez.

All suggesting that Marquez was a relatively clear winner and thus making the fight a robbery.

[miron_lang]

Clearly it does have obvious rounds, as there appears to be an obvious pattern if you are willing to go beyond the opinions of just the 5 Saddo's posters. There is a general pattern of the rounds people are giving to Manny and to Marquez.

All suggesting that Marquez was a relatively clear winner and thus making the fight a robbery.

LMAO

What? hhhahaha

sorry i missed this one Miles