Out of interest Master, can you explain to me why it is worse?
I mean say 5 people go to school. All are bullied. One is black. One is fat. One is ugly. One is gigner. (hang on I guess that means two are ugly now) One is gay.
They are all disliked by certain people at school as a direct result of these characteristics.
According to you, the black guy suffers a far worse time, his ordeal is more hurtful and severe because it is the colour of his skin they dn't like, rather than the amount of skin (fat boy), the hair growing out of the skin (ginger kid) the face that is coated in white skin (ugly boy) etc.
It seems to me that when it comes to name calling I would rather be disliked by someone for somwthing generic and non personal like my race, than something that is part of me directly, ugliness, sexuality, ginger hair, fat etc.
If the real racist element doesnt exist (no subjugation, denial of rights, having to hold an inferior status within your society) then it's just name calling.
I would argue that women in Saudi Arabia are treated far worse than black footballers or golfers in the UK or US. That's real sexism, the denial of rights. On the other hand David Cameron telling a female MP to 'Calm down dear' for example is not real sexism, as he's not subjugating or denying her any rights. She is equal in the eyes of British society.
I just hate that the trivial gets included within the serious.
For example, Bilbo, in Brooklyn recently, swastikas and KKK were spray-painted in a religious jewish area. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/14/ny...f=antisemitism Given the historical context, nazis killed millions of jews, the kkk strung jews up in the south, it is more hurtful than if the spray-paint was fat bastards.
We have a very high profile case here being re-tried the murder of the black teenager Stephen Lawrence.
http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct...BGlRH8tVEaoXiw
Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.
I do agree though that the race card is pulled way too frequently. I completely am with you on that one. I also agree that the double standard is ignored way too frequently. Imagine if Carl Froch took the key from Bernard and said he would never lose to a black boy. It would be endless outrage.
Woah now wait a damn minute...I don't like the KKK but I'm fairly certain they were more anti-black than anti-semite, now the Aryan Nation/Neo-Nazi's who mistakenly use the Battle Flag of the Confederacy to support their cause, THEY dislike the Jews.
I'll have you know, the Confederate States would have more than likely had a Jewish President as their 2nd or 3rd President. Judah P. Benjamin was the Treasurer of the C.S.A. and was well respected by all in the South.
The KKK started up POST Civil War (War of Northern Aggression) due to Reconstruction as all of the officers in the CSA's armed forces had the right to vote taken from them, and land owners got screwed too as Plantations were cut up and given away to carpet baggers and former slaves. Now eventually it degenerated into just a pure hate group, but the KKK had started out as people of wealth and class trying to reestablish political control over their land.
That said, all of the organizations I mentioned: KKK, Neo-Nazi's, Aryans, etc....they can all go rot in my opinion
Actually I completely agree with you on this, and with master regarding Stephen Lawrence. I would also see use of the N word as a direct racial attack. But footballers slagging each other off and a caddy slagging of his former employee and friend has no racial subtext imo and to claim so trivialises real racism.
As to the caddy just calling him an asshole if he wasn't racist rather than a black asshole I totally disagree. All insults are preceeded by a personal slur. It's very unnatural to make an insult without it. Try it. Do you call someone a bastard, or fat bastard, ugly bastard, ginger bastard, whiny bastard etc? There is always a descriptive that prefaces the swear word, always. It's always the thing that stands out to most define that person as well. For Tiger its being black.
For the record Luis Suarez called Patrice Evra "negrito" which is NOT racist in South American/Central American/Hispanic culture....so Evra is just a whiny little bastard with a delicate constitution
Nah I'm not bored of it, I just think many of the situations are rather sad or amusing depending on the circumstances.
BTW, if I were to call Miles a whiny English cunt, am I being prejudice against the English? Or is that a descriptor?
Yes you are again displaying prejudice against the English by inserting English in-between whiny and the four letter c word. The construction of your sentence implies that the English are whiny and the plural version of the four letter c word. It is not a descriptor, a descriptor is a term used in Libraries,Website design in fact anywhere a database needs a way to index information for easy future retrieval. It was coined by Calvin Northrup Mooers the American computer scientist in 1948.
It is precisely because you think Tiger Woods (womanising Hypocrite that he is) being black, is his most defining characteristic and that you then throw black into the same territory as fat, ugly and ginger that you fail to see the inherent racism in calling someone a black asshole. White fat bastard, White ugly bastard, both racist,Ginger Bastard not racist but more offensive than bastard.
How many other elite level golfers are black? Being black IS Tiger Woods most defining characteristic in relation to other golfers. If he was a basketball player or boxer it wouldn't be, but his colour is what stands out in the golfing world and in my opinion its a weird reverse positive racism that people like you try to adopt, pretending everyone is the same colour.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks