Quote Originally Posted by Dropanuke View Post
I mean eubank senior.
My point is british fighters seem to hover around the wbo, in my eyes there are 2 belts WBC and WBA and WBC to me is more quality, I don't even class ibf as a real title but that's my opinion.
And it's not about blood and guts either nor glory as you elequently put it, it's about winning and proving yourself.
Why do I rate Carl froch? Because he has purposely gone out and Fought them all!
Cleverly could do the same but like I said he would rather be a mandatory man (protected)
The thing is Cleverly, is at the begin of his rein as a champion,age and time is on his side,
it's not about fighting the very best, at this stage in his career.?
As for belt's WBC or WBA,being of more quality it's not the belt it's the man that wear's it.?
Froch doe's not have time on his side age, and he take's far to many punch's.
Remember this game is about money, and there can be lot's of it my man so just think about
it.?