Joe Calzaghe: Andre Ward is good but beatable

[shza]

Hopkins didnt beat Calzaghe

He didnt win the fight

he didnt land enough punches, didnt throw enough to land them, didnt take a step forward

sometimes i can understand other sides to arguments in fights, that one there was no argument

if someone could show me any of the last 8 rounds where hopkins was on top for more than a single punch ill eat my words

Is Calzaghe your favorite fighter ?

ha

nah he isnt that great

least i like some fighters tho eh?

Tommy Hearns is my all time favorite , so it was just a simple question , sorry if the question offended you.

dont be sorry its a sign of weakness

and no offence taken, i thought you had turned a serious conversation into a bit of fun, so i joined in

im dissapointed in you tho, you are British right? you dont support Manchester United do you?

if you want a serious answer then I am English, Calzaghe is welsh so no he isnt my favourite fighter

Glad you are being honest about your irrational pro-British bias. It's obvious from all of your posts (your previous one included) but good that you at least admit it.

[eagle]

Hey, good old fashioned debate on this topic. Bit difficult for me to decide who would win this fight but Calzaghe is a hrad man to beat on points, and I cant see Ward knocking him out,

On the other hand if Ward were to fight and beat say Bute and Hopkins/Dawkins in the next year or 2 he'd have a resume in less than 30 fights that may have surpassed Calzaghes much longer career.

[erics44]

Glad you are being honest about your irrational pro-British bias. It's obvious from all of your posts (your previous one included) but good that you at least admit it.

if you are refering to my post about calzaghe beating hopkins then you are clearly more bias than i am for thinking that i am bias for thinking that

Get me?

[shza]

Glad you are being honest about your irrational pro-British bias. It's obvious from all of your posts (your previous one included) but good that you at least admit it.

if you are refering to my post about calzaghe beating hopkins then you are clearly more bias than i am for thinking that i am bias for thinking that

Get me?

You should probably go back and read the exchange, if you can.

I'll remind you: you attempted to browbeat someone for being British but not sucking Calzaghe's dick. I don't recall anything about Hopkins.

[erics44]

You should probably go back and read the exchange, if you can.

I'll remind you: you attempted to browbeat someone for being British but not sucking Calzaghe's dick. I don't recall anything about Hopkins.

Nope you misunderstood the exchange, which is a pity coz arguing about who is more bias is always my favourite argument

Its Always a real diamond when someone plays the 'youre bias' card

[Dark Lord Al]

You should probably go back and read the exchange, if you can.

I'll remind you: you attempted to browbeat someone for being British but not sucking Calzaghe's dick. I don't recall anything about Hopkins.

Nope you misunderstood the exchange, which is a pity coz arguing about who is more bias is always my favourite argument

Its Always a real diamond when someone plays the 'youre bias' card

HAHAHA it reminds me of the Monty Python sketch ,

" Good morning I have come here for an argument "
" No you havent "
"Yes I have"
"No im certain you havent"
"Well we are arguing now"
" No we are not"


etc lol

[erics44]

You should probably go back and read the exchange, if you can.

I'll remind you: you attempted to browbeat someone for being British but not sucking Calzaghe's dick. I don't recall anything about Hopkins.

Nope you misunderstood the exchange, which is a pity coz arguing about who is more bias is always my favourite argument

Its Always a real diamond when someone plays the 'youre bias' card

HAHAHA it reminds me of the Monty Python sketch ,

" Good morning I have come here for an argument "
" No you havent "
"Yes I have"
"No im certain you havent"
"Well we are arguing now"
" No we are not"


etc lol

exactly

hi you must be bias
no you must
no you must
no you
you
you

its exciting shit

by the way dark al, i was just being saracastic about your sarcasm

so i double sarcasitcated you

[ElTerribleMorales]

Calzaghe can say anything he wants, but FACT is that Ward already has a better looking resume than Calzaghe ever did, only standout wins are Lacey and Kessler, and Ward beat up Kessler a lot worse than Joe did, unless Calzaghe is looking to step back in the ring and try to back his crap up (he wont cause there's no one who's shot to shit like Jones was) he just needs to shut the fuck up and try to make everything bout himself, and all this talk about a prime Joe this and a prime Joe that, a prime Joe struggled and was given a fucking gift against the likes of Reid, Ward isn't some come straight forward one dimensional drone like Lacey, he's not limited in variety of punches like Kessler, Ward is a natural super middleweight who is in his prime or close to it who can box and move yet can still get inside and brawl, Calzaghe NEVER faced anyone like him in his entire career

[Dark Lord Al]

You should probably go back and read the exchange, if you can.

I'll remind you: you attempted to browbeat someone for being British but not sucking Calzaghe's dick. I don't recall anything about Hopkins.

Nope you misunderstood the exchange, which is a pity coz arguing about who is more bias is always my favourite argument

Its Always a real diamond when someone plays the 'youre bias' card

HAHAHA it reminds me of the Monty Python sketch ,

" Good morning I have come here for an argument "
" No you havent "
"Yes I have"
"No im certain you havent"
"Well we are arguing now"
" No we are not"


etc lol

exactly

hi you must be bias
no you must
no you must
no you
you
you

its exciting shit

by the way dark al, i was just being saracastic about your sarcasm

so i double sarcasitcated you

Well Eric i was already thinking about being sarcastic even before you said anything sacastic to me ,so ipredicted your sarcasm , therefore I three times outdid your sarcastic post ! I your with