Robbery of the year...the fans have spoken.

[FinitoElDinamita]

Well, the people voted..

Marquez-pac was the robbery of the year...

[:::PSL:::]

And still. No one here can give a clear explaination why it was a robbery.

[Mars_ax]

PSL, I know what you're saying, but it's not going to change anyone's mind, if some fans want to believe there was a robbery, let them think what they want, who cares?

BTW, in the poll posted in the OP, Pacquiao-Marquez III was only seen as the “Robbery of the Year” by 43 percent of the fans who voted, so it's not like it was unanimous.

Paul Williams-Erislandy Lara got 32.1 percent, that would have been my pick after the screwing Dereck Chisora got in his fight with Robert Helenius which only got 9.8 percent of the votes.

This Ring mag poll is fucking worthless when you figure that Chisora and Lara really took it up the ass, and Marquez only lost a close competitive fight.

[:::PSL:::]

PSL, I know what you're saying, but it's not going to change anyone's mind, if some fans want to believe there was a robbery, let them think what they want, who cares?

BTW, in the poll posted in the OP, Pacquiao-Marquez III was only seen as the “Robbery of the Year” by 43 percent of the fans who voted, so it's not like it was unanimous.

Paul Williams-Erislandy Lara got 32.1 percent, that would have been my pick after the screwing Dereck Chisora got in his fight with Robert Helenius which only got 9.8 percent of the votes.

This Ring mag poll is fucking worthless when you figure that Chisora and Lara really took it up the ass, and Marquez only lost a close competitive fight.

Exactly!

[:::PSL:::]

i think JMM supporters are contnuing to stay blind and won't accept the fact that it was a close fight.

Most JMM fans mindset: "if we don't cry out that there was a robbery, then we're automatically accepting Pac won the fight".

Lmfao! Look. it was a close fight and could have gone other way. But to say a robbery occured.. is just pure retarded.