Re: Kell Brook vs Matthew Hatton March 17th, everyones thoughts??

Originally Posted by
Rantcatrat

Originally Posted by
erics44
its not really a waisted fight, its big in britain
there arent many boxers who are house hold names in britain and matthew hatton is as well known a boxer as they come, brook is better than hatton but not as well known
it will raise brooks profile to the none boxing fan on these shores, especially if its well promoted, we will get a lot of people watching who wouldnt normally tune in
it will also raise his profile in america, everyone in america knows who matthew hatton is and how well he fought against alverez, if brook can do a number on him his next fight will definately be either for a world title or as near as it comes
having said that CUMMON HATTON!
From a business perspective in Britain, I get it. It's important to develop a fan base there. From a fan's perspective, it's a sorry fight. He's ready for the jump. You know what fight would make more sense and still very winnable? Lure Breides Prescott up to 147 for a fight. Draws the comparison with Khan and builds a fight with him for the future.
perhaps most avid boxing fans would have like to have seen a bigger fight yes
the general part time fan is probably quite confortable with it tho, especially in britain
i know boxing and yes i would like kel to step up, i think he is more than capable of beating the best
on the other hand i love a big all british scrap, and this is a reasonable size, so im glad the two of them are fighting, it will be a big night for me
Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend
Bookmarks