please tell me what happened when pacman n barrera fought

[AdamGB]

He didnt win the featherweight title or the superfeather weight title . He keeps fighting Morales but he needs to fight the champion

I don't know what your on about but Pacquiao was the featherweight champion. He relinquished that championship to move up to Jr.L. As for Pacquioa/ Barrera it was a one sided beating. Barrera got a knockdown that was clearly a slip then it was all over. manny just swarmed all over him. Barrera had the opportunity for an immediate rematch but didn't take it. If a rematch emerged I think the exact same thing would happen.

"the featherweight champion " is abit nebulous. Could you provide me with the name of th sanctioning body of which Pacquiao was champion ?

If you don't know then your part of the problem in boxing. But I'll help you out... The Ring champion. The only belt that counts. All these alphabet groups are ruining the sport. At least the ring is trying to bring some credibility back to the champions.

I dont need your help . If wana go by what a corrupt biased Yank Magazine says then thats your problem . They can promote whoever they choose but I think the fans can decide for themsleves and see who the best is out there .

They can give the ring belt to whoever they want and they do .Sometimes it may be deserving sometimes it may be BS but we can make that decison

Given that the ring magazine is aimed at fight fans, why would it make sense to go against what the majority of fans think to be the true champions... what would that agenda acheive... except to alienate readers and destroy the magazine and belt's credibility (or in 3 words: make, no, Money)?

[Galaxy]

He didnt win the featherweight title or the superfeather weight title . He keeps fighting Morales but he needs to fight the champion

I don't know what your on about but Pacquiao was the featherweight champion. He relinquished that championship to move up to Jr.L. As for Pacquioa/ Barrera it was a one sided beating. Barrera got a knockdown that was clearly a slip then it was all over. manny just swarmed all over him. Barrera had the opportunity for an immediate rematch but didn't take it. If a rematch emerged I think the exact same thing would happen.

"the featherweight champion " is abit nebulous. Could you provide me with the name of th sanctioning body of which Pacquiao was champion ?

If you don't know then your part of the problem in boxing. But I'll help you out... The Ring champion. The only belt that counts. All these alphabet groups are ruining the sport. At least the ring is trying to bring some credibility back to the champions.

I dont need your help . If wana go by what a corrupt biased Yank Magazine says then thats your problem . They can promote whoever they choose but I think the fans can decide for themsleves and see who the best is out there .

They can give the ring belt to whoever they want and they do .Sometimes it may be deserving sometimes it may be BS but we can make that decison

Given that the ring magazine is aimed at fight fans, why would it make sense to go against what the majority of fans think to be the true champions... what would that agenda acheive... except to alienate readers and destroy the magazine and belt's credibility (or in 3 words: make, no, Money)?

Chur bro, at least you know whats going on. If you go by any other championships your fooling yourself.

[GAME]

He didnt win the featherweight title or the superfeather weight title . He keeps fighting Morales but he needs to fight the champion

I don't know what your on about but Pacquiao was the featherweight champion. He relinquished that championship to move up to Jr.L. As for Pacquioa/ Barrera it was a one sided beating. Barrera got a knockdown that was clearly a slip then it was all over. manny just swarmed all over him. Barrera had the opportunity for an immediate rematch but didn't take it. If a rematch emerged I think the exact same thing would happen.

"the featherweight champion " is abit nebulous. Could you provide me with the name of th sanctioning body of which Pacquiao was champion ?

If you don't know then your part of the problem in boxing. But I'll help you out... The Ring champion. The only belt that counts. All these alphabet groups are ruining the sport. At least the ring is trying to bring some credibility back to the champions.

I dont need your help . If wana go by what a corrupt biased Yank Magazine says then thats your problem . They can promote whoever they choose but I think the fans can decide for themsleves and see who the best is out there .

They can give the ring belt to whoever they want and they do .Sometimes it may be deserving sometimes it may be BS but we can make that decison

Given that the ring magazine is aimed at fight fans, why would it make sense to go against what the majority of fans think to be the true champions... what would that agenda acheive... except to alienate readers and destroy the magazine and belt's credibility (or in 3 words: make, no, Money)?

Chur bro, at least you know whats going on. If you go by any other championships your fooling yourself.

You carry on being brainwashed but myself and many others can see for them selves whos the best . We dont nned to be told by a publication adding thneir own titles to the farcial amount we already have . These belts dont mean shit .

Now originally you said Pac was featherweight champ then failed to provide me with the specifics . In 10 years time when people are looking on boxerec it wont say he beat fighter a for the championship . He didnt win or lose a title in that weight class. Whether he was number 1 is irrelevant , point is he wasnt champ

[Galaxy]

He didnt win the featherweight title or the superfeather weight title . He keeps fighting Morales but he needs to fight the champion

I don't know what your on about but Pacquiao was the featherweight champion. He relinquished that championship to move up to Jr.L. As for Pacquioa/ Barrera it was a one sided beating. Barrera got a knockdown that was clearly a slip then it was all over. manny just swarmed all over him. Barrera had the opportunity for an immediate rematch but didn't take it. If a rematch emerged I think the exact same thing would happen.

"the featherweight champion " is abit nebulous. Could you provide me with the name of th sanctioning body of which Pacquiao was champion ?

If you don't know then your part of the problem in boxing. But I'll help you out... The Ring champion. The only belt that counts. All these alphabet groups are ruining the sport. At least the ring is trying to bring some credibility back to the champions.

I dont need your help . If wana go by what a corrupt biased Yank Magazine says then thats your problem . They can promote whoever they choose but I think the fans can decide for themsleves and see who the best is out there .

They can give the ring belt to whoever they want and they do .Sometimes it may be deserving sometimes it may be BS but we can make that decison

Given that the ring magazine is aimed at fight fans, why would it make sense to go against what the majority of fans think to be the true champions... what would that agenda acheive... except to alienate readers and destroy the magazine and belt's credibility (or in 3 words: make, no, Money)?

Chur bro, at least you know whats going on. If you go by any other championships your fooling yourself.

You carry on being brainwashed but myself and many others can see for them selves whos the best . We dont nned to be told by a publication adding thneir own titles to the farcial amount we already have . These belts dont mean S*** .

Now originally you said Pac was featherweight champ then failed to provide me with the specifics . In 10 years time when people are looking on boxerec it wont say he beat fighter a for the championship . He didnt win or lose a title in that weight class. Whether he was number 1 is irrelevant , point is he wasnt champ

All you need todo is look at a recent Ring boxing Almanac, under World title lineage & it's all there in black & white.

[Preme]

He didnt win the featherweight title or the superfeather weight title . He keeps fighting Morales but he needs to fight the champion

I don't know what your on about but Pacquiao was the featherweight champion. He relinquished that championship to move up to Jr.L. As for Pacquioa/ Barrera it was a one sided beating. Barrera got a knockdown that was clearly a slip then it was all over. manny just swarmed all over him. Barrera had the opportunity for an immediate rematch but didn't take it. If a rematch emerged I think the exact same thing would happen.

"the featherweight champion " is abit nebulous. Could you provide me with the name of th sanctioning body of which Pacquiao was champion ?

If you don't know then your part of the problem in boxing. But I'll help you out... The Ring champion. The only belt that counts. All these alphabet groups are ruining the sport. At least the ring is trying to bring some credibility back to the champions.

I dont need your help . If wana go by what a corrupt biased Yank Magazine says then thats your problem . They can promote whoever they choose but I think the fans can decide for themsleves and see who the best is out there .

They can give the ring belt to whoever they want and they do .Sometimes it may be deserving sometimes it may be BS but we can make that decison

Given that the ring magazine is aimed at fight fans, why would it make sense to go against what the majority of fans think to be the true champions... what would that agenda acheive... except to alienate readers and destroy the magazine and belt's credibility (or in 3 words: make, no, Money)?

Two great fighters, 1 American, one britsh... we all now who would get the belt

As for the topic at hand, i think abrrer should of gotten back into the ring with pac after the third morales fight, he was at his best then and would of beaten pac, within the 12 rounds imo

[GAME]

He didnt win the featherweight title or the superfeather weight title . He keeps fighting Morales but he needs to fight the champion

I don't know what your on about but Pacquiao was the featherweight champion. He relinquished that championship to move up to Jr.L. As for Pacquioa/ Barrera it was a one sided beating. Barrera got a knockdown that was clearly a slip then it was all over. manny just swarmed all over him. Barrera had the opportunity for an immediate rematch but didn't take it. If a rematch emerged I think the exact same thing would happen.

"the featherweight champion " is abit nebulous. Could you provide me with the name of th sanctioning body of which Pacquiao was champion ?

If you don't know then your part of the problem in boxing. But I'll help you out... The Ring champion. The only belt that counts. All these alphabet groups are ruining the sport. At least the ring is trying to bring some credibility back to the champions.

I dont need your help . If wana go by what a corrupt biased Yank Magazine says then thats your problem . They can promote whoever they choose but I think the fans can decide for themsleves and see who the best is out there .

They can give the ring belt to whoever they want and they do .Sometimes it may be deserving sometimes it may be BS but we can make that decison

Given that the ring magazine is aimed at fight fans, why would it make sense to go against what the majority of fans think to be the true champions... what would that agenda acheive... except to alienate readers and destroy the magazine and belt's credibility (or in 3 words: make, no, Money)?

Two great fighters, 1 American, one britsh... we all now who would get the belt

As for the topic at hand, i think abrrer should of gotten back into the ring with pac after the third morales fight, he was at his best then and would of beaten pac, within the 12 rounds imo

Well said preme , you know your stuff

[Galaxy]

He didnt win the featherweight title or the superfeather weight title . He keeps fighting Morales but he needs to fight the champion

I don't know what your on about but Pacquiao was the featherweight champion. He relinquished that championship to move up to Jr.L. As for Pacquioa/ Barrera it was a one sided beating. Barrera got a knockdown that was clearly a slip then it was all over. manny just swarmed all over him. Barrera had the opportunity for an immediate rematch but didn't take it. If a rematch emerged I think the exact same thing would happen.

"the featherweight champion " is abit nebulous. Could you provide me with the name of th sanctioning body of which Pacquiao was champion ?

If you don't know then your part of the problem in boxing. But I'll help you out... The Ring champion. The only belt that counts. All these alphabet groups are ruining the sport. At least the ring is trying to bring some credibility back to the champions.

I dont need your help . If wana go by what a corrupt biased Yank Magazine says then thats your problem . They can promote whoever they choose but I think the fans can decide for themsleves and see who the best is out there .

They can give the ring belt to whoever they want and they do .Sometimes it may be deserving sometimes it may be BS but we can make that decison

Given that the ring magazine is aimed at fight fans, why would it make sense to go against what the majority of fans think to be the true champions... what would that agenda acheive... except to alienate readers and destroy the magazine and belt's credibility (or in 3 words: make, no, Money)?

Two great fighters, 1 American, one britsh... we all now who would get the belt

As for the topic at hand, i think abrrer should of gotten back into the ring with pac after the third morales fight, he was at his best then and would of beaten pac, within the 12 rounds imo

Well said preme , you know your stuff

Only cause the American would knock the British guy out!!! But seriously then how come Calzaghe is the super-middleweight champion? I know he's from Wales but he beat an American in Lacy.

[Purist]

Barerra got his head whooped. Thats what happened. Was rooting for Pacquiao so I was happy