I think he is, seems a little high risk low reward to meOriginally Posted by Rantcatrat
Isn't Vanes his mandatory?
 |
|
|
|
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
NZ Golden Boy
Array
Re: Who should Alvarez fight next?
I think he is, seems a little high risk low reward to meIsn't Vanes his mandatory?
The Best There Is, The Best There Was, The Best There Ever Will Be
Up-and-Coming
Array
Re: Who should Alvarez fight next?
I read somewhere that the winner of the Kirkland/Molina fight must face Vanes for the right to be Canelo's mandatory.I think he is, seems a little high risk low reward to meIsn't Vanes his mandatory?
Forum Greatest Of All Time
Array
Re: Who should Alvarez fight next?
In an ideal world, Kirkland beats Molina and Vanes and then we get Kirkland/Canelo. But Kirkland could easily lose either of those fights.I read somewhere that the winner of the Kirkland/Molina fight must face Vanes for the right to be Canelo's mandatory.I think he is, seems a little high risk low reward to meIsn't Vanes his mandatory?
NZ Golden Boy
Array
Re: Who should Alvarez fight next?
Isn't Vanes already #1 in that alphabet group? Doesn't that make him mandatory challenger?In an ideal world, Kirkland beats Molina and Vanes and then we get Kirkland/Canelo. But Kirkland could easily lose either of those fights.I read somewhere that the winner of the Kirkland/Molina fight must face Vanes for the right to be Canelo's mandatory.I think he is, seems a little high risk low reward to meIsn't Vanes his mandatory?
The Best There Is, The Best There Was, The Best There Ever Will Be
Up-and-Coming
Array
Re: Who should Alvarez fight next?
that's what i thought, but for some reason i'm pretty sure he must face kirkland/molina winner to become the mandatory.Isn't Vanes already #1 in that alphabet group? Doesn't that make him mandatory challenger?In an ideal world, Kirkland beats Molina and Vanes and then we get Kirkland/Canelo. But Kirkland could easily lose either of those fights.I read somewhere that the winner of the Kirkland/Molina fight must face Vanes for the right to be Canelo's mandatory.I think he is, seems a little high risk low reward to meIsn't Vanes his mandatory?
right now the leading contenders are mosley, rodriguez, and bracero. Rodriquez is the best option of the three, and not a bad fight for Canelo at this stage.
NZ Golden Boy
Array
Re: Who should Alvarez fight next?
I agree about Rodriguez, but I still think an Angulo bout would be a warthat's what i thought, but for some reason i'm pretty sure he must face kirkland/molina winner to become the mandatory.Isn't Vanes already #1 in that alphabet group? Doesn't that make him mandatory challenger?In an ideal world, Kirkland beats Molina and Vanes and then we get Kirkland/Canelo. But Kirkland could easily lose either of those fights.I read somewhere that the winner of the Kirkland/Molina fight must face Vanes for the right to be Canelo's mandatory.I think he is, seems a little high risk low reward to meIsn't Vanes his mandatory?
right now the leading contenders are mosley, rodriguez, and bracero. Rodriquez is the best option of the three, and not a bad fight for Canelo at this stage.
The Best There Is, The Best There Was, The Best There Ever Will Be
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks