Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Array
Array
J.M Marquez based on what he has accomplished and the competition he's fought. Finito Lopez Notable second.
Array
Array
Marquez especially early on in career is easily one of the best technicians I've ever seen from beginning to near end, he could be from Mars or Pluto and it would apply. Chavez with respect was not a 'brawler'. I'm no fan really but dude was a master at punch placement and combo technique. He gets slept on at light where he was a pretty sharp boxer.
Depends on what your looking for. Mexican fighters are stereotyped big time. Even Barrera went from straight comer but transformed in later years to very crafty all around boxer. One guy for me was Humberto Gonzalez. Pretty sure he was born south of the boarder. He was a devastating puncher with his ko losses all coming in near same dramatic fashion, but he was a sound boxer too. How he turned total boxer with blood streaming down his face to beat rival Carbajal not once, but twice still blows me away. Ok 2nd was debatablebut what a transition in game plan. If your going pure defensive wiz how about a Miguel Canto! A rarity who made the ring his own dance stage. Ricardo Lopez right up there. Has to go down as one of the best thinkers and explosive combination hitters there was. Foot placement was amazing!
Funny how this thread turned into a shitfest on two of the finest...but not knowing to much about the previous generations I say jmm
Array
Just because somebody didn't box in a 'classical boxing' style, it doesn't mean that they shouldn't be considered technical boxers.
He wasn't Mexican, but for example ..... Roberto Duran wasn't a 'boxer', but he had very very underrated boxing skills and his technique was solid as a rock. Barerra was a boxer/puncher who always got involved in wars ...... but the reason he wiped the floor with Naz was because his boxing technique was superior and it didnt buckle under pressure. Same for Chavez - he was a 'Mexican' fighter and he really redefined that genre - but everything he did was built of solid, professional and well trained high-discipline technique.
I'd agree that sanchez was the more recognised STYLIST, but arguably Chavez and Barrera are also up there for their boxing skills.
If God wanted us to be vegetarians, why are animals made of meat ?
Array
Array
Array
seeing how I was 2 yrs old for the Rosario fight, and don't even rank Camacho too highly in the first point, don't see how it would sting me all that much, nice try though
I didn't downplay Chavez as the greatest fighter to come out of Mexico, but IMO he his defense (or lack of) is what separates him from the likes of Lopez and Marquez
Array
fought the very best, no padding what so ever. JMM numero uno!
[SIGPIC]
Hidden Content
Array
Juan Manuel Marquez.. Not only is he the greatest Mexican to ever lace em up but he's on that level with the Sugar Rays...
Array
For my likings... on technical ability.
"Finito" Lopez
"Dinamita" Marquez
"Chava" Sanchez
Roman
Saldivar
"El Maestro" Canto
"Terrible" Morales
"Baby Faced Assassin" Barrera
Honor mentions to: "Maestrito" Lopez
Array
Ricardo Lopez
Array
I don't quite understand why Chavez doesn't qualify. He's my pick! Followed by Barrera and then Sanchez.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks