Hello!

Yes, I agree with most of you that WK is the best. I also dont think that the HWs are that bad. Its easy to only remember the memorables. Ali had problems with Chuvalo and many other fighters, Foreman lost to Jimmy young and sometimes thought with no defence.... so no one is perfect. The issue is to learn from defeats like Foreman did, and this WK is good at.

What guts to go up against the undefeated heaviest hitter in the world to prove a point. Sure after the fact we may say that Peter was beatable, but at that time we didnt know how good he was. Having been hit by Peter and gotten up, now, WK knows what he can take and wont get flustered. And by the way: Sanders is a very good southpaw world champion; fast, agile, smart, super aggresive, finnisher; not perfect but when well motivated really good, no dishonor in losing to him.

The WK I saw against Byrd was great. He had defence and got hit very rarely while still governing the action. Not bad against a very experience master boxer. Nice to see that they respect each other so much on a personal level. Both men a blessing for the sport. Unfortunately the general public are only interested in psycotic, criminal, or loudmouthed fighters.