Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 27

Thread: Are British boxers too protected these days.

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1,603
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    812
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Now can everyone one see that wbo isn't a real title cos the WBC wouldn't put up with this shite!!!
    Example: I'm Sergio Martinez iv got the WBC then I'm going to defend against chris eubank jr or a ranked 200 fighter. I mean come on that's what real champs are about isn't it? I mean cleverly I thought was a champ and had passion and fans?? Chuckle chuckle

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    North Wales
    Posts
    9,844
    Mentioned
    392 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    990
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are British boxers too protected these days.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dropanuke View Post
    Now can everyone one see that wbo isn't a real title cos the WBC wouldn't put up with this shite!!!
    Example: I'm Sergio Martinez iv got the WBC then I'm going to defend against chris eubank jr or a ranked 200 fighter. I mean come on that's what real champs are about isn't it? I mean cleverly I thought was a champ and had passion and fans?? Chuckle chuckle
    It seem you worship at the alter of the WBC, this organisation is just as corrupted as the rest you are
    fooling yourself otherwise.The WBC ban Chisora without a hearing at lest the BBBC had a hearing and
    he will have a appeal.At one time the WBC were bed fellow's with one Mr King if you did not fight for
    King no WBC shot for you my friend.
    Don't kid yourself about boxing's governing body's,none are whiter than white remember that bit of
    plastic around there wast,its the fighter not the belt that's a real Champion.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    6,272
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Red face Re: Are British boxers too protected these days.

    Cleverly gets protected cuz he sucks.

    Promising young british fighters dont get babied as much. Take Kev for instance. He took on a very dangerous prescott and took em to school.. Then a prime katsidis etc...

    There is no choice but to protect guys like cleverly and burns although hes scottish or whatever.lol they are limited, domestic talents.

    Kell brook may have been protected but hes still the truth..

    Kev and brook are the real deals.. Rest of them are ordinary and must be protected.. Look for ricly burns to go on that belt milking tour against part time fish n chips makers. Looks like hres already starting to make excuses to back out from a showdown with kev... Talking about conflict of schedules blah blah..

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    North Wales
    Posts
    9,844
    Mentioned
    392 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    990
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are British boxers too protected these days.

    Quote Originally Posted by FinitoElDinamita View Post
    Cleverly gets protected cuz he sucks.

    Promising young british fighters dont get babied as much. Take Kev for instance. He took on a very dangerous prescott and took em to school.. Then a prime katsidis etc...

    There is no choice but to protect guys like cleverly and burns although hes scottish or whatever.lol they are limited, domestic talents.

    Kell brook may have been protected but hes still the truth..

    Kev and brook are the real deals.. Rest of them are ordinary and must be protected.. Look for ricly burns to go on that belt milking tour against part time fish n chips makers. Looks like hres already starting to make excuses to back out from a showdown with kev... Talking about conflict of schedules blah blah..
    Finito see your still in love Kev, remember bud the ones you love let you down as for Cleverly he's in
    no hurry age is on his side careers are a marathon not a sprint my friend.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    381
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    760
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are British boxers too protected these days.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dia bando View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by FinitoElDinamita View Post
    Cleverly gets protected cuz he sucks.

    Promising young british fighters dont get babied as much. Take Kev for instance. He took on a very dangerous prescott and took em to school.. Then a prime katsidis etc...

    There is no choice but to protect guys like cleverly and burns although hes scottish or whatever.lol they are limited, domestic talents.

    Kell brook may have been protected but hes still the truth..

    Kev and brook are the real deals.. Rest of them are ordinary and must be protected.. Look for ricly burns to go on that belt milking tour against part time fish n chips makers. Looks like hres already starting to make excuses to back out from a showdown with kev... Talking about conflict of schedules blah blah..
    Finito see your still in love Kev, remember bud the ones you love let you down as for Cleverly he's in
    no hurry age is on his side careers are a marathon not a sprint my friend.
    If thats the case he should give up the title and fight the lower fighters without pretending they are top opposition. When Warren and Clev avoid there manditory ranked ninth in the world and take on someone ranked 40th in the world, they might as well give the belt up. There are people in line who have earned a shot at this title and Clev and Warren have worked it so a undeserving fighter gets a shot just because he is a safer fight. ITS ALL WRONG.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    67,097
    Mentioned
    1706 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3146
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are British boxers too protected these days.

    British fighters are no more protected than they were many years ago or most other countries. As has been said, the aim is to maximise the income of the fighter, and then try and achieve things in that order. Fighters will eventually find their level in the end but ability (think Galzaghe or Naz), age (think Froch), ring wars (think Froch again) and ambition (think Hatton leaving Warren) are factors that influence how far they progress.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    381
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    760
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are British boxers too protected these days.

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    British fighters are no more protected than they were many years ago or most other countries. As has been said, the aim is to maximise the income of the fighter, and then try and achieve things in that order. Fighters will eventually find their level in the end but ability (think Galzaghe or Naz), age (think Froch), ring wars (think Froch again) and ambition (think Hatton leaving Warren) are factors that influence how far they progress.
    Well I for one am a fan of a fighter. I didnt watch the last two cleverly fights properly, just sky plus and fast foward it to a ko or decision victory. As far as Murray goes I remember people saying how he was the next best thing but knew as soon as he was put against reasonably good opposition he would lose. He was prowd of his record for being the british fighter with most fights undefeated. But they were a bunch of losers. I just cant enjoy watching people beat on weaker people for so long.
    I know UFC is less entertaining than boxing but at least the fighters are challenged at the right level.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    987
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are British boxers too protected these days.

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    British fighters are no more protected than they were many years ago or most other countries. As has been said, the aim is to maximise the income of the fighter, and then try and achieve things in that order. Fighters will eventually find their level in the end but ability (think Galzaghe or Naz), age (think Froch), ring wars (think Froch again) and ambition (think Hatton leaving Warren) are factors that influence how far they progress.

    you have to think about timing too

    take john murray as a good example, im not saying he was ever a world beater but had he been stepped up a few fights before then maybe he would have progressed a bit better

    perhaps not the strongest example

    by the way i think the opening post is very harsh
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    6,176
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2345
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are British boxers too protected these days.

    I think there are some that are & some that aren't

    Groves & DeGale have been match-up ok
    The Best There Is, The Best There Was, The Best There Ever Will Be

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    north-east of england
    Posts
    2,881
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1926
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Are British boxers too protected these days.

    Always rated kell brook for way way back and even though he hasn't really been tested though he looked really good against durable Mathew hatton.kell brook didn't even break sweat againt hatton and made a great account of himself as a great uk prospect.kevin Mitchell is coming on strong after getting his private life issues out the way.kevin mitchell is worth a world title.Ricky burns is looking awesome at his new weight and proved his worth at world title level.David price is another good prospect for us Brits think he has the right tools to dominate the heavyweight division after a bit more experience.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Best British boxers never to win world title
    By Toffeefist in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 08-28-2011, 09:28 PM
  2. British boxers all time favourites
    By roberto duran legend in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 05-20-2011, 07:51 PM
  3. Biggest upsets involving British boxers
    By porkypara in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 02-21-2009, 04:43 PM
  4. Top Ten Post-War British Boxers
    By taansend in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 11-05-2007, 11:05 PM
  5. Your most overrated British boxers?
    By columbo in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 72
    Last Post: 07-09-2007, 07:05 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2026 Saddo Boxing - Boxing