A Close Look At David Haye vs. Dereck Chisora

[AdamGB]

He was very negative, but he landed (a few) punches... Valuev landed basically none. Simple really.

What the fuck are you on about? I know Haye was falling over on purpose! I highlighted it because it was a feeble attempt at getting Points taken away from Wlad, rather than actually trying to earn those points by landing any punches. Also, so what he beat Valuev, Chagaev had already done it and better. Fair enough he hurt him but thats all he did. Hayes "explosive" power will mean nothing when hes blowing out his ass after the 4th because hes been pressured. He hasnt been in with any young heavyweights yet. The yougest he fought, beat him easily! In fact, who is Hayes best win to guage just how good he is? Probably Mormeck I suppose who Bell had already battered. Which Haye performance makes him stand out? Macaranelli? Who couldnt knock him out!

The point is that Chisora's pedigree is hardly better. What's his best win? He bagged a round or two against an aging Vitali, however bad you think Haye is I don't think that alone proves he trumps him.

[ross]

Just because Chisora has some losses doesnt make him a worse fighter at heavy than Haye. If we give Chisora the benefit of the doubt then he was totally unfocused for Fury as hed just been let down by Wlad after the fight being rescheduled as well. The Helenius fight was a total robbery and I think with a bit more experience he would have beaten Vitali! He only had 17 fights behind him. If Haye had fought those 3 fighters, there would be at least 2 KO losses Whereas Chisora beats all Hayes heavyweight opponents and I include Wlad in that. Vitali has a better output than Wlad.

[erics44]

haye v chisora will be a one sided beating and just come down to whether or not chisora can last 12 rounds

chisora has virtually no chance of winning