Fuck elite boxing so bad. Hehe
Bradley fought well but won 4 rounds the way I saw it. He got hurt a couple times and pressed very little. PAC was the aggressor and had cleaner effective punches.
Good fight...money driven decision
Fuck elite boxing so bad. Hehe
Bradley fought well but won 4 rounds the way I saw it. He got hurt a couple times and pressed very little. PAC was the aggressor and had cleaner effective punches.
Good fight...money driven decision
Was Manny the aggressor? I saw Bradley throw a lot more punches, coming forward just as much trading shots with Manny many times. There is no way Manny was the sole aggressor in this fight just because Bradley chose to more fully box a few times along the way. Once again people aren't taking the whole fight into account, and many times Bradley took the fight Manny especially in the last four rounds, that's 33% of the fight! He also did very well in the early rounds. That's only two of the many close rounds he needed to win. Even when HBO had Manny way ahead they didn't often felt like he was winning close competitive rounds. EVen some of those middle rounds he was clearly winning weren't super one sided people will have to see when they can watch the fight again.
I had money on Bradley but Pacman won easy. I dont give a damn on the money i won , Pacman was the winner . If anyone scored it for Bradley , they don't know anything about boxing.
I thought it would be unanimous here as to the fact that Pacquiao won, but I guess that's not the case. Regardless of how ludicruous it may seem, some people thought it was a close fight and that Bradley may have won.
But this just emphasizes the problem. Opinions are so far-ranging in major fights sometimes, that it makes for lousy, controversial decisions. The major network commentators are also becoming more and more vocal in their dislike of some of these decisions.
The fact is nobody wins here. Boxing is the ultimate loser. Who wants to continue following a sport where after 12 rounds of battle, we have to be subjected to the judges' whim? Where the possibility of incompetence and corruption is on everyone's mind? Who wants to continue to see fights after seeing something like tonight?
Attempts have been made to make judging more objective, such as the CompuBox numbers. Both even those are dependent on input based on human observation. And yet we continue to have extremely controversial decisions.
What irks me is that no one within the sport and with any power is doing a damn thing to try to rectify the situation. It's not like boxing is enjoying a huge amount of popularity right now. This sort of shit makes it worse.
I thought Bradley edged a close fight and the judges were surprisingly on the ball.
Good decision.
I'm not saying Bradley won, I am just saying it was close and this is a perfect example of compubox failing. Manny landed a lot, but he missed way more than he landed, a lot of close punches were barely missing, but they were missing. If Manny landed that many power punches he would have ko'ed Bradley. That fact is that he was bleeding worse than Bradley despite the power difference, he was more gassed than Bradley, there has to be a reason for that. The reason was that it was a tough fight. Once again I am saying that I felt Manny won, but by about 2 rounds. People are upset because Manny is so popular and his style is easy to see winning, but in this instance he looked better to the average viewer than he actually was. I think he actually was the best technically and on the ball I've ever seen, but I mean in terms of Bradley being able to hang with him and really give him all kinds of trouble.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks