...and thats why it doesn't matter who the house fighter is.
all he wants is bad decisions in big fights. the more outrageous the better.
Despite all of the chatter, it was not a one-sided match with a bad decision.
BALANCE, LEVERAGE, ACCURACY, SPEED and TIMING - Effective punching.
rematch
Have it in Los Angeles or London England and away from sin city Las Vegas.
It is about time this fixation on Vegas and all the glitz was replaced by some
old time locations where the actual fights are not just extensions of the glitz
fast money and the story of many broken dreams and tragic stories.
BALANCE, LEVERAGE, ACCURACY, SPEED and TIMING - Effective punching.
I honestly think it was close and id have no problem if pac was given then win and I have no problem with Bradley getting it.
But I do honestly think boxing could learn alot from UFC.
I have not watched the fight and do not know if Arum did fix the fight. He is dammed if he Manny wins controversially against JMM and damned if Manny loses controversially against Bradley. I do know he wants Pac Man to avoid Floyd and wants to keep all fights under Top Rank so he never loses either way. However I do not believe he fixed the fight for Bradley to win because it discredits Pac Man ‘s aura of invincibility and ultimately marketability which is his main focus. It may put people off boxing and paying for the event. So all in all I do not think Arum fixed it but that it was just a bad decision.
Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.
I believe any fighter who ends Pacquiao's current reign and has a victory over Manny Pacquiao, almost becomes an instant star. Robbery or Not, deserved or not.
Bradley's marketability just skyrocketed. While Bob might have been getting an idea that Pacquaio was either leaving or retiring.
He was quick to make a name of Bradley, IMO, before it was too late.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks