Rounds 5 and 7

[ruthless rocco]

i reviewed these rounds on another thread. i've copied them here.
Round 5:
the 2 judges that scored the fight for bradley each scored the 5th round in his favour...how is that possible? bradley landed 4 light (malignaggi-like) jabs, a body shot and one power connect to the head. everything else was on pac's gloves. while pac had him reeling for 20 seconds and made 15 solid head shots.you can't possibly score that for bradley!!!
Round 7:
all three judges scored the seventh round for bradley. it was a close round but pac connected with harder cleaner punches, while bradley jabbed pac's arms for 2 minutes then arm punched a few "power" punches.
pac was more effective and hit harder. can't give bradley the round even tho it was closer than the others.

the scoring of these two rounds is very problematic for me.

[0james0]

I scored the first two for Bradley, then 3 or 4 in a row for Pac.

[Pugilistic]

I scored rounds 5 and 7 for Pacquiao.

I remember Bradley keeping the 5th close and could of won it.

Don't remember the 7th well enough.

[armin]

well i just rewatched half the fight, and yeah no clue how you score the 5th for bradley. 80% of his "punches" in the round were pawing jabs, literally not even thrown but pushed out and manny had him hurt with about 30 secs to go definite pac round for me, and i like bradley.sucks for the sport but im not as pissed of at this decision as some others lately maybe because just not that big a fan of pac since i think he wrongly got the nod over jmm, but 2 shit decisions dont make a right one...oh well, were all still going to tune in next time round