The WBO review cards by 5 Int judges are in.

[fan johnny]

so even with the 5 different judges they only agreed that 5 of the 12 rounds were clearly Pacquiao's?! if anything they justified the decision rather than discredited it

That's just stupid! How many rounds were clear for Bradley? You have to compare apples to apples. The justification is 5 clear rounds Pacquiao and 1 clear round for Bradley. You would have a better case scoring it 43/17.

you say this now but it's the same argument that was used to justify Marquez/Pacquiao III in Manny's favor

Huh? Look, Pacquiao lost against Bradley same as Marqez lost against Chris John. The better fighter lost on points because he didn't do enough to get the win in the Judges eyes. They both got complacent/lazy whatever you want to call it and left the results to chance. Fighters can't do that and expect to get the sympathy vote, because they are the better figghter. Bradley had the best corner man shouting at him when he needed the motivation. "We're in a fuck'n fight! forget about your funk'n foot"

[Violent Demise]

so even with the 5 different judges they only agreed that 5 of the 12 rounds were clearly Pacquiao's?! if anything they justified the decision rather than discredited it

That's just stupid! How many rounds were clear for Bradley? You have to compare apples to apples. The justification is 5 clear rounds Pacquiao and 1 clear round for Bradley. You would have a better case scoring it 43/17.

you say this now but it's the same argument that was used to justify Marquez/Pacquiao III in Manny's favor

Huh? Look, Pacquiao lost against Bradley same as Marqez lost against Chris John. The better fighter lost on points because he didn't do enough to get the win in the Judges eyes. They both got complacent/lazy whatever you want to call it and left the results to chance. Fighters can't do that and expect to get the sympathy vote, because they are the better figghter. Bradley had the best corner man shouting at him when he needed the motivation. "We're in a fuck'n fight! forget about your funk'n foot"

You can't compare Marquez shameful robbery loss to John to Bradley-Pacquiao. Pacquiao didn't have numerous bullshit points deducted against him like Marquez had against John.

[InTheNeutralCorner]

so even with the 5 different judges they only agreed that 5 of the 12 rounds were clearly Pacquiao's?! if anything they justified the decision rather than discredited it

That's just stupid! How many rounds were clear for Bradley? You have to compare apples to apples. The justification is 5 clear rounds Pacquiao and 1 clear round for Bradley. You would have a better case scoring it 43/17.

you say this now but it's the same argument that was used to justify Marquez/Pacquiao III in Manny's favor

Huh? Look, Pacquiao lost against Bradley same as Marqez lost against Chris John. The better fighter lost on points because he didn't do enough to get the win in the Judges eyes. They both got complacent/lazy whatever you want to call it and left the results to chance. Fighters can't do that and expect to get the sympathy vote, because they are the better figghter. Bradley had the best corner man shouting at him when he needed the motivation. "We're in a fuck'n fight! forget about your funk'n foot"

You can't compare Marquez shameful robbery loss to John to Bradley-Pacquiao. Pacquiao didn't have numerous bullshit points deducted against him like Marquez had against John.

What are those bullshit points that were deducted and are they part of boxing?

[fan johnny]

so even with the 5 different judges they only agreed that 5 of the 12 rounds were clearly Pacquiao's?! if anything they justified the decision rather than discredited it

That's just stupid! How many rounds were clear for Bradley? You have to compare apples to apples. The justification is 5 clear rounds Pacquiao and 1 clear round for Bradley. You would have a better case scoring it 43/17.

you say this now but it's the same argument that was used to justify Marquez/Pacquiao III in Manny's favor

Huh? Look, Pacquiao lost against Bradley same as Marqez lost against Chris John. The better fighter lost on points because he didn't do enough to get the win in the Judges eyes. They both got complacent/lazy whatever you want to call it and left the results to chance. Fighters can't do that and expect to get the sympathy vote, because they are the better fighter. Bradley had the best corner man shouting at him when he needed the motivation. "We're in a fuck'n fight! forget about your funk'n foot"

You can't compare Marquez shameful robbery loss to John to Bradley-Pacquiao. Pacquiao didn't have numerous bullshit points deducted against him like Marquez had against John.

You missed the point completely. The comparison is not about an "opinion" of who won the fight. That was just a simple statement of historical fact. It has noting to do with my opinion. Marquez lost to John just as Pacquiao lost to Bradley.

The point was neither fighter did enough to secure the win as a result left the fight up to a subject perspective. Both Pacquiao and Marquez got complacent and that is what ultimately lead to their loss. i.e they both thought they did enough to get the win. Pacquiao started coasting whether it was to give the fans a show, he got lazy, or thought he was ahead. It was in fact too little an effort to get two of the judges votes.

[GOAT]

Crooked compu-box, corrupted judges, faked review-cards, counting phantom-punches,......

What's next

[InTheNeutralCorner]

Does anyone know which version of the fight these international judges watched and was it with volumes on?