OK... how did you score the Pac-Bradley fight?

[TitoFan]

It has become quite clear that the Pac haters are a lot less subjective in judging the Bradley fight than what they claim the "Pactards" to be. Funny turn of events, if you ask me.

First, you've got 90% of the civilized world giving Pac the decision, from all sorts of differents forums. You've got the WBO, who went to the trouble of commissioning 5 pro boxing judges to "re-judge" the fight, with the results being completely in Pac's favor. These are not "Pactard" rantings. These are factual events.

But on the other hand, you've got these "so-called" objective fans on the forum, who are really Pac-haters masquerading as objective fans, who do nothing but bring up the Pac-Marquez fight(s). As if by some warped logic, their anger in seeing Pac getting those decisions translates into Bradley being the justified winner in THIS fight. Scary logic, if you ask me.

Then, in laughable fashion, they lash out at anyone and everyone who dares to think that Pac won..... labeling them "Pactards" and spewing insults and outlandish claims. Incredible.

Hey..... it it's really that important, then let's just say that Bradley won and the hell with it, ok?




(On a side note, and to show that I'M objective...... I don't dislike any of the fighters involved. I'm a huge JMM fan, so no story there. I also like Pac, but don't consider myself a "Pactard". I also like Bradley. He fought his heart out and gave 110%. What's not to like? Also, and for the record..... I'm totally against any notion that Bradley should give back the title given to him in the ring. It was a bad decision, but stripping Bradley makes for a dangerous precedent. I AM, however, in favor of an immediate rematch. I think Bradley himself would want it, just to clear his good name. Not that it was Bradley's fault. He only fought..... he didn't fuck up the decision.)

Carry on.

[Jimanuel Boogustus]

It has become quite clear that the Pac haters are a lot less subjective in judging the Bradley fight than what they claim the "Pactards" to be. Funny turn of events, if you ask me.

First, you've got 90% of the civilized world giving Pac the decision, from all sorts of differents forums. You've got the WBO, who went to the trouble of commissioning 5 pro boxing judges to "re-judge" the fight, with the results being completely in Pac's favor. These are not "Pactard" rantings. These are factual events.

But on the other hand, you've got these "so-called" objective fans on the forum, who are really Pac-haters masquerading as objective fans, who do nothing but bring up the Pac-Marquez fight(s). As if by some warped logic, their anger in seeing Pac getting those decisions translates into Bradley being the justified winner in THIS fight. Scary logic, if you ask me.

Then, in laughable fashion, they lash out at anyone and everyone who dares to think that Pac won..... labeling them "Pactards" and spewing insults and outlandish claims. Incredible.

Hey..... it it's really that important, then let's just say that Bradley won and the hell with it, ok?




(On a side note, and to show that I'M objective...... I don't dislike any of the fighters involved. I'm a huge JMM fan, so no story there. I also like Pac, but don't consider myself a "Pactard". I also like Bradley. He fought his heart out and gave 110%. What's not to like? Also, and for the record..... I'm totally against any notion that Bradley should give back the title given to him in the ring. It was a bad decision, but stripping Bradley makes for a dangerous precedent. I AM, however, in favor of an immediate rematch. I think Bradley himself would want it, just to clear his good name. Not that it was Bradley's fault. He only fought..... he didn't fuck up the decision.)

Carry on.

You ARE a Pactard - you just don't know it yet

[TitoFan]

It has become quite clear that the Pac haters are a lot less subjective in judging the Bradley fight than what they claim the "Pactards" to be. Funny turn of events, if you ask me.

First, you've got 90% of the civilized world giving Pac the decision, from all sorts of differents forums. You've got the WBO, who went to the trouble of commissioning 5 pro boxing judges to "re-judge" the fight, with the results being completely in Pac's favor. These are not "Pactard" rantings. These are factual events.

But on the other hand, you've got these "so-called" objective fans on the forum, who are really Pac-haters masquerading as objective fans, who do nothing but bring up the Pac-Marquez fight(s). As if by some warped logic, their anger in seeing Pac getting those decisions translates into Bradley being the justified winner in THIS fight. Scary logic, if you ask me.

Then, in laughable fashion, they lash out at anyone and everyone who dares to think that Pac won..... labeling them "Pactards" and spewing insults and outlandish claims. Incredible.

Hey..... it it's really that important, then let's just say that Bradley won and the hell with it, ok?




(On a side note, and to show that I'M objective...... I don't dislike any of the fighters involved. I'm a huge JMM fan, so no story there. I also like Pac, but don't consider myself a "Pactard". I also like Bradley. He fought his heart out and gave 110%. What's not to like? Also, and for the record..... I'm totally against any notion that Bradley should give back the title given to him in the ring. It was a bad decision, but stripping Bradley makes for a dangerous precedent. I AM, however, in favor of an immediate rematch. I think Bradley himself would want it, just to clear his good name. Not that it was Bradley's fault. He only fought..... he didn't fuck up the decision.)

Carry on.

You ARE a Pactard - you just don't know it yet

Does this mean I have to return my "Pac's Greatest Hits" triple-CD classic collection, and burn my Pac Fan Club membership card?