
Originally Posted by
rjj tszyu
Hmmmm, if Tua and Byrd are classed as his era, shouldn't Lennoz, Tyson and Evander at least get a mention? When Wlad first held the WBO, Lennox was the WBC and IBF (not to mention linear champ too) and Evander was WBA champ. I think that year 2000 Lennox would have all but killed any version of Wladimir. As for Tyson he'd just made Golota quit around about that time too and I think Tyson vs Wlad at that time would have been an interesting fight but one that Mike would end up KO winner in.
Now I know Wlad has improved a shit load since then and I'd actually pick Wlad to beat any version of Tyson NOW, I just think it's a horrible matchup for Tyson.
I see wlads era and lewis' as two different ones, both contained a long running linear champ.
There will be cross over fighters from 2 different era's in any era. Baby wlad competed in lennies era.
Consider Lennoz, Tyson and Evander more than mentioned my friend, however, i really tend to associate them with the 90's, u do have a point though. I hope u can see what im getting at, i think it would demean lennox to give him an honourable mention if u get my drift! 2 different era's really...i also think it demeans wlad to judge him on his fledgling years in the late lewis era.
Bookmarks