
Originally Posted by
TitoFan

Originally Posted by
Fenster

Originally Posted by
TitoFan
If you want to get technical, "Haye fought the best fighter" is also an opinion. "Haye fought the current heavyweight titleholder" is actually the fact. As you were.
Actually that's not a fact.
Haye was also a current heavyweight title holder as was Vitali.
"Chicken Little Boxing Loudmouth Champion" is not a universally recognized title.
Haye fought THE best fighter, who is still considered THE best fighter, according to all the worlds preeminent boxing publications/writers/web sites/TV stations (personally I believe Vitali is/was better than Wlad). As you were.
"Haye fought the current heavyweight titleholder" is not a fact?? Tell me, what part of the statement is untrue? Are you picking on the "the" part? Because if so, objection overruled. Wlad was a current heavyweight titleholder at the time he fought Haye. Quit wasting my time.
Next case!
Exhibit a) Wlad was
THE current heavyweight title holder.
Exhibit b) Wlad was
A current heavyweight title holder.
Does A differ from B? Yes. Is A incorrect? Yes. Is B correct? Yes.
Get your facts straight and stop wasting the court's time. Please proceed.
Bookmarks