Quote Originally Posted by shza View Post
Quote Originally Posted by superheavyrhun View Post
Good to see the IBF are taking drug testing and its results seriously.
The appointed doctors concluded that his T-levels were not abnormally high and thus did not give him an unfair advantage. That was what he said all along -- that he had abnormally low levels and had the procedure just to bring him up to normal. I don't see how how that means the IBF isn't taking drug testing seriously. (They would have been justified in smacking him a little for simply failing to disclose, however, despite the fact that in the end really the only resulting harm was the rematch getting scrapped -- but that's a different issue.)
So basically what I was saying all along
Look back in my posts and I told everyone that after a proper investigation, he would be found to be ok. (while everyone was cunting me off)
Whoever made the point about Peterson being 3.77:1 has no point..because in boxing you are allowed to be 4:1 (or maybe even 6:1 - I forget) so according to the commisions, this is not performance enhancing.

Hate to say I told you so..Who am I kidding. Course I don't. Let's try looking at things objectively fellas. Well done to the IBF for taking into account the facts. The only thing he was guilty of was not informing the testers that he was normalising his testosterone with exogenous testosterone.

Can we stop this butthurt..facts are facts. It could all be bullshit but Peterson and his team made their case perfectly. You can't make someone guilty on assumptions. Like "assuming" Enzo took his shit "by accident".