Quote Originally Posted by smashcrusher
Quote Originally Posted by GAME
You can be justified for saying Shane can beat Mayweather cuz he outboxed a prime Oscar De La Hoya . But if you say Floyd can beat Shane , how can you justify that ? Mitchel ? Castillo , Brussels ?
You couldn't justify Hatton beating Kostya before they fought based on his resume, but he won, BECAUSE HE WAS BETTER. Floyd is better than Shane.

sorry
. . .In your opinion maybe . But if Shane had fought the guys Floyds been fighting then he'd be undefeated too . Can we say the same for Floyd ? I dont think so .

If he fought Vargas id be very surprised if he could lay him out with 1 punch Floyd cant even wobble a chinny Zab Judah but he got floored himself . Lets not forget Floyds only undefeated on paper . He could have been d.q'd against Judah and Castillo beat him fair and square but was robbed .