Quote Originally Posted by GAME
Quote Originally Posted by smashcrusher
Quote Originally Posted by GAME
You can be justified for saying Shane can beat Mayweather cuz he outboxed a prime Oscar De La Hoya . But if you say Floyd can beat Shane , how can you justify that ? Mitchel ? Castillo , Brussels ?
You couldn't justify Hatton beating Kostya before they fought based on his resume, but he won, BECAUSE HE WAS BETTER. Floyd is better than Shane.

sorry
. . .In your opinion maybe . But if Shane had fought the guys Floyds been fighting then he'd be undefeated too . Can we say the same for Floyd ? I dont think so .

If he fought Vargas id be very surprised if he could lay him out with 1 punch Floyd cant even wobble a chinny Zab Judah but he got floored himself . Lets not forget Floyds only undefeated on paper . He could have been d.q'd against Judah and Castillo beat him fair and square but was robbed .

1. youre kidding yourself if you think mayweather would lose to vernon forrest

2. the reason mayweather wasnt dq against judah is because the ref called time BEFORE roger jumped in the ring(if you knew anything about boxing, you would know that tere is nothing wrong with that)

3. castillo lost that fight (which was a VERY close fight with a pre-prime mayweather) and just to shut up the critics (people like you), he beat him more convincingly in a rematch

4. zab got his ass handed to him in a boxing clinic by floyd (not every fight has to be a ko)

5. floyds glove touching the canvas should have been scored a knockdown, but for you to make some dumb ass, ignorant statement like he "got floored" shows what a hater you are