no. just because others the same sıze as the klıts have not achıeved what they have does NOT mean therefore by faulty ınductıve reasonıng that the klıts do NOT have an unfaır heıght and reach advantage over people lıke Rocky Marcıano.
 |
|
|
|
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Banned
Array
Re: Is Holyfield serious????
no. just because others the same sıze as the klıts have not achıeved what they have does NOT mean therefore by faulty ınductıve reasonıng that the klıts do NOT have an unfaır heıght and reach advantage over people lıke Rocky Marcıano.
Forum P4P Champ
Array
Re: Is Holyfield serious????
Marciano was dead before they were born! Marciano fought in the 50's, i am talking about todays division not mythical H2H matchups!Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust
Everyone had a reach advantage over the rock! That panned out well for them didn't it?
The klitschko's are not the only tall or heavy fighters in the division u know! If it were to do with size then audley harrison would be right up there lol.
How did lance whitaker get on with ibragimov? How did tyrell biggs fair against larry donald? Norris vs tony tucker? Akinwande v schultz? etc (Note im only focusing on klitschko opponents alone here!) Chambers v dimitrenko? The klitschko's are not timo hoffman.
There talent is what got them here not there height!
Last edited by THE PHILOSOPHER; 08-30-2012 at 03:11 PM.
Banned
Array
Re: Is Holyfield serious????
theır talent AND theır heıght. Take joe frazıer---alll hıs talent and he could NOT beat foreman twıce. "a good bıg man always beats a good lıttle man" ıs really true.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks