Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 28

Thread: How good was Mike McCallum?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Barnsley
    Posts
    234
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    680
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How good was Mike McCallum?

    A beast of a fighter. Never really got his dues because he missed out on the fab four. He'd have beaten Hearns and Duran for me, and Hagler could have been fight of the decade.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,320
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    787
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How good was Mike McCallum?

    Well Its all about primes, and weight divisions really,I loved watching McCallum
    but he wouldnt beat Hagler, or a lightweight Duran you cheeky bugger

  3. #3
    ICB Guest

    Default Re: How good was Mike McCallum?

    I heard McCallum used to be able to counter Hearns's jab in sparring with those famous body shots, he also beat a poor man's Hearns in Milton McCrory. I think he'd be too tough for Hearns in the end, i also think he'd beat Duran who was too up and down above Lightweight.

    Hagler/McCallum would be a close one too hard for me to call, i think Leonard would beat McCallum though. And my reason's are because a prime McCallum lost handily to Sumbu Kalmabay who used movement and a good jab to beat him, i think Leonard has similar qualties and does those things a bit better than Kalambay.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    11,799
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2271
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How good was Mike McCallum?

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    He was old by the time he was fighting light heavy - light middle and middle weight was his prime.
    Very, I think the additional body mass was an effect of age as opposed to physical development.
    You know I think you're point has a lot of validity. I think anything over 160lbs and MccCallum wasn't himself. That may sound like a cop out for a fighter I am admittedly very fond of, but I actually believe it too

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,320
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    787
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How good was Mike McCallum?

    Quote Originally Posted by ICB View Post
    I heard McCallum used to be able to counter Hearns's jab in sparring with those famous body shots, he also beat a poor man's Hearns in Milton McCrory. I think he'd be too tough for Hearns in the end, i also think he'd beat Duran who was too up and down above Lightweight.

    Hagler/McCallum would be a close one too hard for me to call, i think Leonard would beat McCallum though. And my reason's are because a prime McCallum lost handily to Sumbu Kalmabay who used movement and a good jab to beat him, i think Leonard has similar qualties and does those things a bit better than Kalambay.
    Leonard done things a bit better than Kalambay, are you fucking serious

  6. #6
    ICB Guest

    Default Re: How good was Mike McCallum?

    Quote Originally Posted by roberto duran legend View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ICB View Post
    I heard McCallum used to be able to counter Hearns's jab in sparring with those famous body shots, he also beat a poor man's Hearns in Milton McCrory. I think he'd be too tough for Hearns in the end, i also think he'd beat Duran who was too up and down above Lightweight.

    Hagler/McCallum would be a close one too hard for me to call, i think Leonard would beat McCallum though. And my reason's are because a prime McCallum lost handily to Sumbu Kalmabay who used movement and a good jab to beat him, i think Leonard has similar qualties and does those things a bit better than Kalambay.
    Leonard done things a bit better than Kalambay, are you fucking serious
    Why wouldn't i be serious ?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,241
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3100
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How good was Mike McCallum?

    Quote Originally Posted by ICB View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by roberto duran legend View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ICB View Post
    I heard McCallum used to be able to counter Hearns's jab in sparring with those famous body shots, he also beat a poor man's Hearns in Milton McCrory. I think he'd be too tough for Hearns in the end, i also think he'd beat Duran who was too up and down above Lightweight.

    Hagler/McCallum would be a close one too hard for me to call, i think Leonard would beat McCallum though. And my reason's are because a prime McCallum lost handily to Sumbu Kalmabay who used movement and a good jab to beat him, i think Leonard has similar qualties and does those things a bit better than Kalambay.
    Leonard done things a bit better than Kalambay, are you fucking serious
    Why wouldn't i be serious ?
    Leonard was not that great at middleweight, no way would he have lived with decent middleweights at the time, Hagler screwed his fight up with Leonard. There was a reason Leonard never fought Nunn and the others at the time, because they would have beaten him.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,190
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1078
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How good was Mike McCallum?

    How good was Mike? Roy Jones upped his percentage of body punches after they met and said he knew why then why he was called,"The body snatcher!"

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,241
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3100
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How good was Mike McCallum?

    Quote Originally Posted by roberto duran legend View Post
    Well Its all about primes, and weight divisions really,I loved watching McCallum
    but he wouldnt beat Hagler, or a lightweight Duran you cheeky bugger
    Mike would beat Duran at light middle and middleweight.
    I think he would have beaten Leonard at middlewight too.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Just watched 1st Mike Mccallum fight
    By Motor City Cobra in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 06-24-2009, 05:33 PM
  2. The great Mike McCallum!
    By Markusdarkus in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 06-23-2009, 04:17 PM
  3. one for the purist B- Hopkins v Mike Mccallum.
    By Dark Lord Al in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 05-31-2007, 06:18 AM
  4. Opinions on Mike McCallum?
    By Beanflicker in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 05-31-2007, 01:11 AM
  5. Oscar de la Hoya vs. Mike McCallum at 154
    By skyler in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 09-24-2006, 09:30 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing