Rahman v Povetkin

[Beanz]

@Master even though you think my new Tatt is stupid:-) the Povetkin Rahman fight is about to start.




You little yellow rubber duck on wheels you.

[Mars_ax]

Why the fuck is there 2 threads about this fight?

[Tam Seddon]

Rahman needs to retire asap.

[Freedom]

Povetkin did what he had to, and stopped Rahman in round two.

After he defeats Wach, Wladimir Klitschko will fight either Povetkin or Pulev in early 2013.

[Spicoli]

Rahman sounds terrible. He needs to go far far away.

[Mars_ax]

Rahman sounds terrible. He needs to go far far away.

@Spicoli, I tried to send you a PM, but your inbox is full, and says you need to make space before you can receive more PMs.

cheers

[Spicoli]

Rahman sounds terrible. He needs to go far far away.

@Spicoli, I tried to send you a PM, but your inbox is full, and says you need to make space before you can receive more PMs.

cheers

Cool man. I never clean that thing out.

I just about had coffee through my nose when Rahman "hinted" at rematch. Destined for comic stage that one.

[superheavyrhun]

Why the fuck is there 2 threads about this fight?

You'll excuse me for some sarcasm here, but I believe it's because Master already started a thread some time ago, and then you started another...

[Master]

Why the fuck is there 2 threads about this fight?

You'll excuse me for some sarcasm here, but I believe it's because Master already started a thread some time ago, and then you started another...

@superheavyrhun - Right, Master started a "Povetkin-Rahman" thread, not a fucking "Povetkin-Rahman and Pulev-Ustinov discussion thread", which i'm guessing you must have turned this into sometime today.

For what it's worth, I started my thread on the 26th or last Tuesday, and typically I do the majority of the "fight threads" here, so where's the fucking sarcasm?

It's no big deal with me if you, Master, Freedom, and others want to do all the fight threads, I usually only posted them because nobody else seemed to want to, so from now on have at it, it's all yours mate.

Do not worry about @superheavyrhun he is a trouble maker self absorbed hammer fan.

[superheavyrhun]

Why the fuck is there 2 threads about this fight?

You'll excuse me for some sarcasm here, but I believe it's because Master already started a thread some time ago, and then you started another...

@superheavyrhun - Right, Master started a "Povetkin-Rahman" thread, not a fucking "Povetkin-Rahman and Pulev-Ustinov discussion thread", which i'm guessing you must have turned this into sometime today.

For what it's worth, I started my thread on the 26th or last Tuesday, and typically I do the majority of the "fight threads" here, so where's the fucking sarcasm?

It's no big deal with me if you, Master, Freedom, and others want to do all the fight threads, I usually only posted them because nobody else seemed to want to, so from now on have at it, it's all yours mate.

Do not worry about @superheavyrhun he is a trouble maker self absorbed hammer fan.

@Master and @Mars_ax - Yes, I am prone to being a sarcastic trouble maker. I didn't know about your thread until you posted in here with your rather pointed comment. As the forum's lowest common denominator, I can say that I usually just go to the first thread I see about a fight, and that is often why some threads will get more traffic than others. I can't speak for everyone, but if there are two threads, I usually go to the one with the more replies.

It is of course welcome that you start threads about fights, after all, this is a forum to discuss boxing fights. There's just no point getting all het up and throwing your f-words about if people choose to go to another thread relating to the main event of a fight that was posted first.