Philosopher you are a imbecile with your so called facts.
You should toss out more of your funny remarks, that's all they're good for.

Look at reality, just because Foreman was more experienced does not necessary mean he was better than the original prime version.
IMO he was, he paced hmself better and was a much more well rounded version. Although young george probably beats him, But the more the fight went on....

Young George would have battered old Foreman, in fact old George would never have fought him in the first place.
Did u not read my posts? I already think he would beat the older version, try not jumping in all defensive like and beginning your debate with an insult! What exactly are u a master of? Tiddlywinks? U are talking nonsense now aren't u? U r letting the facts escape u again! When did u see old george get battered by a 210lb featherfist like jimmy young? Older foreman took holyfield best shots! Also when did u see older foreman put down twice in 1 round like he was vs lyle? Oh wait u r going to tell us lyle hit harder than morrison and moorer (who was the only man ever to stop jirov!) LOL. Stick to facts and not your fantasy pasts...

Old George publicly stated he would never fight Lennox because he would be beat, old George was very selective with his opponents.
Wel duhhh.....

Do not compare old George to the prime George,
Who are u to tell me what to do? It is a boxing debating forum.

Stop quoting his comeback fights as a weakness,
I quoted his earlier fights too. A fighters entire career must be taken into consideration...

Now pour yourself a drink, put on some lipstick and pull yourself together!