Kell Brook

[Vendettos]

The road to a title, theses day's some would say is easy,! but you can get beaten any
time. Take Ricky Burn's he had lost a few, but he has become a respected Champion has he not,
nothing flash a good solid fighter and very underrated.
I have seen a hell of a lot of boxers fight, Brook is a good fighter and I feel will make it to the top
I remember Lloyd Honeygan, was given no chance against Don Curry but he beat him well , and he
was supposed to be the next big thing. So before knocking Brook , think long and hard remember
Floyd and Pacman are the best in the division, they can't last forever and you carry on to long you
will be beat it's a fact.

I hope so! Remember I've been very careful not to underrate him or say he is overrated!


I'm merely stating that I don't believe he has been tested enough to know exactly how much ability he has!
It's easy to look good against opponents that aren't up to scratch!

[ono]

But for a fighter with 29 fights, he is relatively untested.

I agree he was in tiptop shape last night but I need to see him in a long hard fight.

So far I'd have to say that he doesn't really deserve a world title shot, not when compared to other domestic fighters like Carl Froch a couple weight classes up, he's fights continuouslym the hardest fighters in the class for years.

Brook need a fight against just 1 top light welterweight before I'll be impressed.

So you don't think he deserves a title shot, but you want him to fight against one of the divisions best.......who would by default be more than likely to be a world champion - given his standing as the best in the division.

[Master]

Kell would beat Hatton and Khan but he does not have the title so he has to bring that in before either of them will fight him. If Hatton and Khan had a choice they would fight one another, Paulie Maliggnaggia or Floyd/Pac Man than Kell Brook. Hearn’s is raving mad if he thinks he can negotiate 50/50 or even 70/30 split in Kells favour.