
Originally Posted by
DavilaJones
A quick question for those who believe DeMarco is a live underdog or perhaps a clear winner, do you base this assumption based on the Ponce De Leon fight "win" by Broner or the Linares victory by DeMarco?
For me its as simple as the later mostly, meaning what DeMarco has proven what he is capable of rather than what Broner has shown he is not.
Again this is his 25th fight.
That fight with Linares was no 'fluke'.
And I suppose Vaiero was? Talk about there to be hit. Valero could not box his way out of a wet paper bag.
People have rose colored glasses on for a guy who has been over 8 rounds once...once!
So? Tyson never went past 5 or 6 in his first 20? Not sure what this rose coloured thing is all about.
I know DeMarco has run much deeper in career and I think he is being written off as some run of the mill also ran.
I have not done that.
He is as methodical and thinking a fighter as they come.
So is Broner. His extraordinary defense combined with jaw shattering counter punching will end this fight.
He is a quality fighter that has made solid improvement. He doesn't flatten guys, he cuts them up and beats them up, and he has been there and done that!
Both are quality fighters.
Bookmarks