You are correct the Klit brothers are not appreciated enough and will be only when they are retired and missed. As they say they are too good for their own good but you have to acknowledged the competition is poor.
Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.
I don't value your opinion whatsoever! You rated Seth Mitchell ffs! 'I wanne see mitchell give K2 a good fight'! LOL. Average Mormeck would KO Seth! Consider this...Adamek defeated Banks and Cunningham who took Seth Mitchell and Marko Hucks 0! Holmes loses to Spinks! VK clowns Adamek! Not as bad as you would like to believe!
Let's do a comparison. E.g Rahman v Peter!
-Peter beat toney twice. Rahman failed twice. Peter beat Maskaev. Rahman failed twice. Peter KO Tauyrus Sykes in 2. Rahman won a UD over him.
Peter (Although outboxed) acquitted himself well in fight #1 (Minus the rabbit punches!) Rahman was embarrassed by Wlad. Rahman was stopped by Byrd victim Holyfield and outboxed by Chagaev victim Ruiz! K2 ruined Peter. Also consider Peter beat Mcline who had stopped Michael Grant and outboxed Shannon Briggs too!
Byrd and Gomez poor! Go tell Golota-Holy-Tua and Mcall that! See? Gold medallist's are poor! LOL. U do know that Mcall and Tony Tucker lost to mulitiple K2 victims don't u? Ignoramous!
You're poor. Ibragimov is'nt!
Last edited by THE PHILOSOPHER; 11-24-2012 at 08:13 PM.
What are you babbling on about? I glibly said lets get behind Seth, so what? Like you never have got behind a fighter that got knocked down and lost. Oh yes you have, I forgot Wlad.
Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.
Norton dıdnt pucker hıs anus. Wlad DİD. End of story.
Norton took tons of shots and still carried on. Wlad took a non-shot from Brewster and puckered his anus. Then puckered ıt agaınst Sanders. YOU have the outdayed ideas here, not me. How is reposting somethıng that was common 5 years ago a problem? Stop puckering your quıverıng anus Phılosopher.
YOu are a shıverıng shudderıng anus puckered to the breeze, and you think your arguments are syllogıstıcally sound but ın fact the major AND minor premises of your reasoning are UNsound and therefore you are a cunt and most Saddo members here know you intimately, most on here know you anally and your rectum is barely puckered at this point ın the intercourse.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks