Is Broner's win over DeMarco Equal to Mayweather's win over Corrales?

[Rantcatrat]

Is Broner's win over DeMarco last weekend as big of a win as Mayweather's win over Corrales in 2001? I don't think DeMarco is as good as Corrales was in 2001. Your take?

I don't know how to rate his performance, but he did get a KO against DeMarco who had never been off his feet before and walked away with DeMarco's belt.
I think Broner is going to eclipse Floyd in every way. He's going to sell a lot of Broner caps and shirts, and he will wind up making more money over the length of his career. Hell he might even wind up with a Nike deal.

Didn't Valero TKO DeMarco?

[Spicoli]

Nah. Both long and lanky but in exposure and status Corrales was already entrenched, not to mention his much talked about his one punch ability to erase a face. Demarco had -just-received notice and even then it was talked down, wrongly I think, with a tko loss to Valero and needing to "pull it out" in comeback after sponging tons from Linares. Corrales was a steep level above.

I think likewise the more Broner gets compared to Mayweather the more he's going to regret playing such a cheap parody in the first place. Floyd had already displayed a %100 gameplan against respectable types by the time he played whacka' mole with the late Diego where this was the very first time Broner acted and executed in a high fashion. I believe so anyway. He most certainly toned it down vs Demarco and heard the backlash. I hope! Also he'll never be the backfoot fighter Mayweather is and he rides the pocket almost relying too much on counters. Upper body moving twice as quick as often wide planted legs. He gets touched alot for a guy so quick. Broner needs to be Broner. There are not any brothers from another mother here.