Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 242

Thread: Miguel Cotto vs Austin Trout - Saturday night fight/chat thread

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    6,903
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Miguel Cotto vs Austin Trout - Saturday night fight/chat thread

    And the judges officially say: Trout wins a UD 117-111 x 2 and 119-109, what fight did that judge watch?.

    I officially can not listen to Pauli & Ranello, I had these 2 clowns on mute the whole fight.
    Last edited by Mars_ax; 12-02-2012 at 05:38 AM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    6,903
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Miguel Cotto vs Austin Trout - Saturday night fight/chat thread

    Trout clearly won the fight, but it wasn't too fucking thrilling. In my humble opinion, I believe Trout gives Canelo a run for his money if this fight gets scheduled next.

    A few observations: Trout looked bigger, took Cotto's punches well, and controlled much of the fight. Cotto looked shop worn, but gave it his all which simply wasn't enough.

    Onward to Pacquiao-Marquez IV next weekend on HBO PPV.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Southport
    Posts
    8,224
    Mentioned
    41 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1875
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Trout was impressive last night, I'm gutted Cotto couldn't win but trout simply was the bigger man In there and it showed. He control the fight with his long jab and looked good on the inside too, he rocked Cotto quite a few times too.

    I don't know where Cotto goes from here but he will be pissed after last night, I hope he does fight again but for how long he does is another question.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    9,493
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1369
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Miguel Cotto vs Austin Trout - Saturday night fight/chat thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Mars_ax View Post
    And the judges officially say: Trout wins a UD 117-111 x 2 and 119-109, what fight did that judge watch?.

    I officially can not listen to Pauli & Ranello, I had these 2 clowns on mute the whole fight.
    I've hated Ranello for a long time, had to deal with his corny ass for 8 years from watching MMA. He's always been shit IMO. Paulie has potential IMO but is still "finding his voice" as a commentator I guess.

    As for the fight... I had it 117-111, agreed with the 2 judges. I don't think Trout won 11 rounds like one judge though, but at least they gave it to the right guy.

    It would have been a crying shame if they screwed Trout out of that hard-fought victory.

    Cotto has done big things in the boxing game, and I think if he's thinking about retirement then this may be an opportune time to go through with it. He's had some tough wars, best to quit and get into the promoting game so he can live with a good quality of life after boxing. Either way I wish him the best because he was a hell of a fighter.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    6,903
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Miguel Cotto vs Austin Trout - Saturday night fight/chat thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Beanflicker View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Mars_ax View Post
    And the judges officially say: Trout wins a UD 117-111 x 2 and 119-109, what fight did that judge watch?.

    I officially can not listen to Pauli & Ranello, I had these 2 clowns on mute the whole fight.
    I've hated Ranello for a long time, had to deal with his corny ass for 8 years from watching MMA. He's always been shit IMO. Paulie has potential IMO but is still "finding his voice" as a commentator I guess.

    As for the fight... I had it 117-111, agreed with the 2 judges. I don't think Trout won 11 rounds like one judge though, but at least they gave it to the right guy.

    It would have been a crying shame if they screwed Trout out of that hard-fought victory.

    Cotto has done big things in the boxing game, and I think if he's thinking about retirement then this may be an opportune time to go through with it. He's had some tough wars, best to quit and get into the promoting game so he can live with a good quality of life after boxing. Either way I wish him the best because he was a hell of a fighter.
    Pauli is just fucking sickening, I can't get behind any "man" that wears earrings, and looks and acts the way this clown does. I mean is this cat a straight up fag or what?
    As for Miguel, in fairness Trout was bigger, and much better then people were giving him credit for being. I'm not so sure Cotto wouldn't do well against Alvarez, they're closer to the same size, but it remains to be seen if that fight ever happens.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,829
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2039
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Miguel Cotto vs Austin Trout - Saturday night fight/chat thread

    I haven't read through the whole thread, but I agree that Cotto should retire. He gave it his best shot, but his punches weren't doing much to Trout. Cotto's face looked like hell after the fight. Also, Cotto's words sound like someone who's already got one foot out the door. He's got a wonderful family... and what man wouldn't want to spend time with that? I still think Cotto, for his size, did as much as he could at 154. That is not his best weight. That he won any championships at all at that weight is astounding. But Trout was younger, bigger, faster. I had a pretty good crowd over at the house watching the fight, and we got quieter and quieter as the fight went along. After 7-8 rounds... you sort of know where the fight is going.

    On a happier note, I was ecstatic at seeing some good Puerto Rican prospects put in some very good efforts. Young blood coming up. That's what the sport's all about.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    552
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    903
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Miguel Cotto vs Austin Trout - Saturday night fight/chat thread

    I had it 11-1 for 119-109.

    I thought the cards were great, I was fearing some sort of sick robbery to rival the most sick. Sure you coulda had it a bit closer but Trout won with more than room to spare.
    maineventboxing.wordpress.com - my mates boxing blog, check it out for fight articles and fight predictions

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    kentucky
    Posts
    4,334
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1193
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by J_C View Post
    I had it 11-1 for 119-109.

    I thought the cards were great, I was fearing some sort of sick robbery to rival the most sick. Sure you coulda had it a bit closer but Trout won with more than room to spare.
    Especially when they took as long as they did I thought they was shaftin trout glad boxing got it right, far to often that's not the case

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    6,763
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1323
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Miguel Cotto vs Austin Trout - Saturday night fight/chat thread

    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    I haven't read through the whole thread, but I agree that Cotto should retire. He gave it his best shot, but his punches weren't doing much to Trout. Cotto's face looked like hell after the fight. Also, Cotto's words sound like someone who's already got one foot out the door. He's got a wonderful family... and what man wouldn't want to spend time with that? I still think Cotto, for his size, did as much as he could at 154. That is not his best weight. That he won any championships at all at that weight is astounding. But Trout was younger, bigger, faster. I had a pretty good crowd over at the house watching the fight, and we got quieter and quieter as the fight went along. After 7-8 rounds... you sort of know where the fight is going.

    On a happier note, I was ecstatic at seeing some good Puerto Rican prospects put in some very good efforts. Young blood coming up. That's what the sport's all about.
    I completely agree. Cotto was at his best at 140, perhaps 147, but he's definitely undersized against true junior middleweights. He's a guy who would be best fighting at 147. Unfortunately, at his age, he can't get down to 147 anymore. Trout came on the big stage. The problem Trout has is that he doesn't have a big following and is not knockout artist. Clearly, he's a tougher opponent for Floyd Mayweather than Guerrero and for Canelo than Ortiz, but those guys are less risky, and Trout brings nothing besides a belt to the table.

    Oh and @Mars - I completely disagree with regards to Paulie. He's a slick Italian from Staten Island. He's going to dress in flashy Dolce Gabanna suits. If you get passed his style, which doesn't agree with you, you'll warm up to his ability as an announcer. In my opinion, he is doing an excellent job as an announcer. I actually think he should consider permanently retiring from fighting to announce.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,520
    Mentioned
    1699 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3118
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Miguel Cotto vs Austin Trout - Saturday night fight/chat thread

    Cotto was well beaten by the bigger and quality fighter. Cotto should try and fight Saul and call it quits if he loses.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Montreal/Luxembourg
    Posts
    6,399
    Mentioned
    25 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1084
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Miguel Cotto vs Austin Trout - Saturday night fight/chat thread

    I was sure that Cotto would win that one by UD, seems like :

    a) I underestimated the stigmatas from both fights with Pacaman and MArgarito
    b) REally didn't know enough about Trout and clearly underestimated him.

    I won't make these mistakes ever again. BEside, a fight with Canelo would be damn entertaining, I think that now it would make sense to make such happen.
    Hidden Content
    That's the way it is, not the way it ends

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    6,903
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Miguel Cotto vs Austin Trout - Saturday night fight/chat thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    I haven't read through the whole thread, but I agree that Cotto should retire. He gave it his best shot, but his punches weren't doing much to Trout. Cotto's face looked like hell after the fight. Also, Cotto's words sound like someone who's already got one foot out the door. He's got a wonderful family... and what man wouldn't want to spend time with that? I still think Cotto, for his size, did as much as he could at 154. That is not his best weight. That he won any championships at all at that weight is astounding. But Trout was younger, bigger, faster. I had a pretty good crowd over at the house watching the fight, and we got quieter and quieter as the fight went along. After 7-8 rounds... you sort of know where the fight is going.

    On a happier note, I was ecstatic at seeing some good Puerto Rican prospects put in some very good efforts. Young blood coming up. That's what the sport's all about.
    I completely agree. Cotto was at his best at 140, perhaps 147, but he's definitely undersized against true junior middleweights. He's a guy who would be best fighting at 147. Unfortunately, at his age, he can't get down to 147 anymore. Trout came on the big stage. The problem Trout has is that he doesn't have a big following and is not knockout artist. Clearly, he's a tougher opponent for Floyd Mayweather than Guerrero and for Canelo than Ortiz, but those guys are less risky, and Trout brings nothing besides a belt to the table.

    Oh and @Mars - I completely disagree with regards to Paulie. He's a slick Italian from Staten Island. He's going to dress in flashy Dolce Gabanna suits. If you get passed his style, which doesn't agree with you, you'll warm up to his ability as an announcer. In my opinion, he is doing an excellent job as an announcer. I actually think he should consider permanently retiring from fighting to announce.
    Rantcat,
    It's all good if you like Pauli, I just never have cared for the clown, different strokes for different folks. Right now, besides Brian Kenny, Gerbil Farhood and Barry Tompkins, i'm not really liking any of the Showtime crew, including Bernstein who I think is full of shit much of the time. Pauli, Ranello, and Bernstein get muted, not trying to argue that's just me.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northern Canada
    Posts
    9,793
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1007
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Miguel Cotto vs Austin Trout - Saturday night fight/chat thread

    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    I haven't read through the whole thread, but I agree that Cotto should retire. He gave it his best shot, but his punches weren't doing much to Trout. Cotto's face looked like hell after the fight. Also, Cotto's words sound like someone who's already got one foot out the door. He's got a wonderful family... and what man wouldn't want to spend time with that? I still think Cotto, for his size, did as much as he could at 154. That is not his best weight. That he won any championships at all at that weight is astounding. But Trout was younger, bigger, faster. I had a pretty good crowd over at the house watching the fight, and we got quieter and quieter as the fight went along. After 7-8 rounds... you sort of know where the fight is going.

    On a happier note, I was ecstatic at seeing some good Puerto Rican prospects put in some very good efforts. Young blood coming up. That's what the sport's all about.

    Well stated bud

  14. #14
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Antelope Valley, California
    Posts
    5,048
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    791
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Beanflicker View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Mars_ax View Post
    And the judges officially say: Trout wins a UD 117-111 x 2 and 119-109, what fight did that judge watch?.

    I officially can not listen to Pauli & Ranello, I had these 2 clowns on mute the whole fight.
    I've hated Ranello for a long time, had to deal with his corny ass for 8 years from watching MMA. He's always been shit IMO. Paulie has potential IMO but is still "finding his voice" as a commentator I guess.

    As for the fight... I had it 117-111, agreed with the 2 judges. I don't think Trout won 11 rounds like one judge though, but at least they gave it to the right guy.

    It would have been a crying shame if they screwed Trout out of that hard-fought victory.

    Cotto has done big things in the boxing game, and I think if he's thinking about retirement then this may be an opportune time to go through with it. He's had some tough wars, best to quit and get into the promoting game so he can live with a good quality of life after boxing. Either way I wish him the best because he was a hell of a fighter.
    Mauro Domenico Antonio Ranallo, how can you not like a guy with a strong name like that.

    Seriously, I like the way he gets excited, just like most of us do and goes on and on. Hell, he'd fit right in at my house on fight night.

    He keeps his job by acting natural and letting the words flow which adds to the excitement. He says what he thinks and is never short on words.

    Jim Grey is the guy I'd like to see take a permanent vacation. Grey can ask the stupidest questions, in my opinion. My idea of hell would be having to listening to Jim Grey or Larry Merchant interviewing fighters.

    I like Mauro and hope they keep him around.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    603
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1101
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Miguel Cotto vs Austin Trout - Saturday night fight/chat thread

    Just saw the fight it sucked to see Cotto get beat like that especially after the good performance he gave vs Mayweather. I still want to see him fight again maybe fight guerrero I think thats a fight cotto can win as he can over power the smaller guy.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Cotto Vs Trout Dec 1
    By ElTerribleMorales in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 09-01-2012, 04:59 PM
  2. Replies: 18
    Last Post: 04-25-2012, 03:46 PM
  3. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-24-2011, 06:48 PM
  4. NONITO DONAIRE ON SHOWTIME ON SATURDAY
    By SalTheButcher in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-26-2007, 11:37 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing