Quote Originally Posted by Gandalf View Post
The reason is another strategic point of influence. If America wanted Bin Laden they had the opportunity to hand over evidence to the Taliban who were willing to negotiate. They dismissed it and instead invaded. Is it really a sensible strategy to invade an entire nation in the hunt for a handful of wanted men? Most of the time negotiation would suffice and eventually you saw a different method for getting rid of Bin Laden anyway. Invading a country to capture a few terrorists is insane. If there are other motives then it starts to make more sense.
@Andre yes---all that charade not only for going into Iraq but also to put in place the whole Big Brother Control State that they put in all over the US TSA illegal check points Viper Squads warrantless wiretaps spying illegal courts kangaroo vcourts suspension of Habeus Corpus the destruction of Posse Comitatus the illegal detention of human beings held without trial of even without charges for 13 years in secret prisons run by the CIA etc.... Homeland Security you name it---NDAA Guantanamo Obamas right to assassinate ANY american citizen if they even are perceived to be a threat to america illegal drone strikes in myriad countries---9-11 was to set up the entire Control Grid first in the US then abroad---not just for stealing oil.

andre all that is why they did that to justify their stranglehold on the world.