Originally Posted by imp The difference between pac and floyd is purely boxing. Pac has to fight marquez 4 times over a period of so many years and still cant win a clear decison over an old fighter. There is no need for floyd to fight marquez ever again as it was so clear the domination. If its close again, its the leg cramp excuse. Pac ducks bradley to fight an old marquez..boxing stinks. True, But Pacquiao smashed Cotto, De La Hoya, Hatton and Mosley whom gave Floyd fits in the ring.
Hidden Content Welcome to the 21st Century. No Sex, Drug and Rock'n'Roll. All we have nowadays is AIDS, Meth and Crap Music Hidden Content
Originally Posted by CountryBoy Originally Posted by imp The difference between pac and floyd is purely boxing. Pac has to fight marquez 4 times over a period of so many years and still cant win a clear decison over an old fighter. There is no need for floyd to fight marquez ever again as it was so clear the domination. If its close again, its the leg cramp excuse. Pac ducks bradley to fight an old marquez..boxing stinks. True, But Pacquiao smashed Cotto, De La Hoya, Hatton and Mosley whom gave Floyd fits in the ring. Different circumstances and Pac and Floyd are different kinds of fighters.
Originally Posted by CountryBoy Originally Posted by imp The difference between pac and floyd is purely boxing. Pac has to fight marquez 4 times over a period of so many years and still cant win a clear decison over an old fighter. There is no need for floyd to fight marquez ever again as it was so clear the domination. If its close again, its the leg cramp excuse. Pac ducks bradley to fight an old marquez..boxing stinks. True, But Pacquiao smashed Cotto, De La Hoya, Hatton and Mosley whom gave Floyd fits in the ring. You obviously havent been reading the entire thread. When you have, let us know.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
View Tag Cloud
Forum Rules
Bookmarks