Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  15
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 98

Thread: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    England
    Posts
    5,980
    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1050
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Marquez would prob beat Naz.

    If pac and naz did fight would it simply be a case of who ever got hit first would be going down?

    The tree trunk legs of both these fighters is crazy.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    969
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    this is in actual fact a fact
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,607
    Mentioned
    1700 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3124
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    I always thought JMM had the style to beat Naz which was why he was avoided. Against Manny Pac that would be a pick em and I would go for Naz.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3139
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    Naz would have bombed out Marquez too. AS great as Marquez is, he's been down around 10 million times during his career

    You go down against Naz..... it's over.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,848
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2043
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    Marquez has proven to be right up there with the great MAB.
    Only thing different about a JMM-Naz fight is JMM would've introduced Naz to the other corner post.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3139
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    I think Marquez has surpassed the great Barrera.

    However, any boxing expert, especially one versed in the technical artistry of the sport, can only envisage one winner with prime Naz countering his bombs against those exposed bonces.

    Marquez would have lasted longer than Pac, but ultimately it's impossible to see either of these serial canvas victims getting past 3. Against old Naz Marquez might have gone the distance. Pac would have still gone in 3. It's just basic undeniable logic.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,848
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2043
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    Au contraire, mod. Naz's undisciplined style and awkwardly thrown shots would've been tailor-made for the counterpunching Marquez. The seasoned pro (JMM) would be drooling all over himself waiting for Naz to hang himself out to dry... only to potshot the shit out of him. Not one to be impressed by the gangly, hands-down approach of Naz... Marquez, (in his own right a very patient fighter)... would eventually tag Naz and put him down. The fact that Marquez has tasted canvas before is of little or no consequence. Pac put him down 3 times in the first round of their first fight. Marquez survived the round, and went on to dominate the last half of the fight, earning him a draw.

    Only question in my mind is whether it would be a neutral corner post, JMM's corner post, or Naz's own corner post..... or whether JMM would go for the trifecta.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Montreal/Canada
    Posts
    646
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1240
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    I think Marquez has surpassed the great Barrera.

    However, any boxing expert, especially one versed in the technical artistry of the sport, can only envisage one winner with prime Naz countering his bombs against those exposed bonces.

    Marquez would have lasted longer than Pac, but ultimately it's impossible to see either of these serial canvas victims getting past 3. Against old Naz Marquez might have gone the distance. Pac would have still gone in 3. It's just basic undeniable logic.
    That depends which version of Pac would have fought, before or after changing his religion.
    The fact is all three lose against the great Mighty Mike. Fact

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Further proof there are too many titles
    By killersheep in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 01-11-2010, 03:08 PM
  2. No Proof That He's Guilty?
    By sanj16 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 01-06-2010, 12:02 AM
  3. Some proof against evolution
    By Von Milash in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-09-2007, 08:25 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing