Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  15
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 98

Thread: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3153
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    Naz would have bombed out Marquez too. AS great as Marquez is, he's been down around 10 million times during his career

    You go down against Naz..... it's over.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,888
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2057
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    Marquez has proven to be right up there with the great MAB.
    Only thing different about a JMM-Naz fight is JMM would've introduced Naz to the other corner post.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3153
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    I think Marquez has surpassed the great Barrera.

    However, any boxing expert, especially one versed in the technical artistry of the sport, can only envisage one winner with prime Naz countering his bombs against those exposed bonces.

    Marquez would have lasted longer than Pac, but ultimately it's impossible to see either of these serial canvas victims getting past 3. Against old Naz Marquez might have gone the distance. Pac would have still gone in 3. It's just basic undeniable logic.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,888
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2057
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    Au contraire, mod. Naz's undisciplined style and awkwardly thrown shots would've been tailor-made for the counterpunching Marquez. The seasoned pro (JMM) would be drooling all over himself waiting for Naz to hang himself out to dry... only to potshot the shit out of him. Not one to be impressed by the gangly, hands-down approach of Naz... Marquez, (in his own right a very patient fighter)... would eventually tag Naz and put him down. The fact that Marquez has tasted canvas before is of little or no consequence. Pac put him down 3 times in the first round of their first fight. Marquez survived the round, and went on to dominate the last half of the fight, earning him a draw.

    Only question in my mind is whether it would be a neutral corner post, JMM's corner post, or Naz's own corner post..... or whether JMM would go for the trifecta.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    11,430
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2110
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    I have to conclude from the sound logic in this thread that Hamed would have ruined MAB too.

    p4p all time no. 1

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3153
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    Look, I'm just basing this factual reasoning on pure statistcal verified data.

    Naz had a 100% knockdown to knockout conversation rate at featherweight. That is a fact. Marquez hit the canvas numerous times at featherweight, let alone other weights. Therefore the stats indicate Naz, who was P4P one of the hardest punchers ever, KO's Marquez.

    Marquez is a greater fighter than Naz in the grand scheme of things. But even if Naz knocked him spark out, which is highly likely, it wouldn't have altered Marquez high postion in boxing. Fact.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Look, I'm just basing this factual reasoning on pure statistcal verified data.

    Naz had a 100% knockdown to knockout conversation rate at featherweight. That is a fact. Marquez hit the canvas numerous times at featherweight, let alone other weights. Therefore the stats indicate Naz, who was P4P one of the hardest punchers ever, KO's Marquez.

    Marquez is a greater fighter than Naz in the grand scheme of things. But even if Naz knocked him spark out, which is highly likely, it wouldn't have altered Marquez high postion in boxing. Fact.
    Cesar Soto went the full 12 with Hamed. The same Cesar Soto who was stopped in 1 round by Adrian Valdez. Sounds to me like you trying to say Hamed isn't the fighter Valdez was. Interesting.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,888
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2057
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Look, I'm just basing this factual reasoning on pure statistcal verified data.

    Naz had a 100% knockdown to knockout conversation rate at featherweight. That is a fact. Marquez hit the canvas numerous times at featherweight, let alone other weights. Therefore the stats indicate Naz, who was P4P one of the hardest punchers ever, KO's Marquez.

    Marquez is a greater fighter than Naz in the grand scheme of things. But even if Naz knocked him spark out, which is highly likely, it wouldn't have altered Marquez high postion in boxing. Fact.

    You're playing silly numbers games. Naz knocked out everyone he ever knocked down....... Marquez has hit the canvas before. So you add A plus B, and you get C. Then you throw Marquez a backhanded compliment saying he would "highly likely" get knocked out by Naz... but he'd still be great. Cute.

    Has anyone bought that, that you know of?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Montreal/Canada
    Posts
    646
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1254
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    I think Marquez has surpassed the great Barrera.

    However, any boxing expert, especially one versed in the technical artistry of the sport, can only envisage one winner with prime Naz countering his bombs against those exposed bonces.

    Marquez would have lasted longer than Pac, but ultimately it's impossible to see either of these serial canvas victims getting past 3. Against old Naz Marquez might have gone the distance. Pac would have still gone in 3. It's just basic undeniable logic.
    That depends which version of Pac would have fought, before or after changing his religion.
    The fact is all three lose against the great Mighty Mike. Fact

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Further proof there are too many titles
    By killersheep in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 01-11-2010, 03:08 PM
  2. No Proof That He's Guilty?
    By sanj16 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 01-06-2010, 12:02 AM
  3. Some proof against evolution
    By Von Milash in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-09-2007, 08:25 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing