Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  15
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 98

Thread: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3124
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    Look, I'm just basing this factual reasoning on pure statistcal verified data.

    Naz had a 100% knockdown to knockout conversation rate at featherweight. That is a fact. Marquez hit the canvas numerous times at featherweight, let alone other weights. Therefore the stats indicate Naz, who was P4P one of the hardest punchers ever, KO's Marquez.

    Marquez is a greater fighter than Naz in the grand scheme of things. But even if Naz knocked him spark out, which is highly likely, it wouldn't have altered Marquez high postion in boxing. Fact.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Look, I'm just basing this factual reasoning on pure statistcal verified data.

    Naz had a 100% knockdown to knockout conversation rate at featherweight. That is a fact. Marquez hit the canvas numerous times at featherweight, let alone other weights. Therefore the stats indicate Naz, who was P4P one of the hardest punchers ever, KO's Marquez.

    Marquez is a greater fighter than Naz in the grand scheme of things. But even if Naz knocked him spark out, which is highly likely, it wouldn't have altered Marquez high postion in boxing. Fact.
    Cesar Soto went the full 12 with Hamed. The same Cesar Soto who was stopped in 1 round by Adrian Valdez. Sounds to me like you trying to say Hamed isn't the fighter Valdez was. Interesting.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northern Canada
    Posts
    9,793
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    997
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    Styles make fights.

    I think the 126 Marquez puts on a clinic and Manny probably gets stopped. Marquez was never off his feet prior to Manny and it was the speed and opposite side that worked at the start. Hameds rubber band man routine does not work with Marquez southpaw or not.
    Last edited by IamInuit; 12-11-2012 at 03:20 AM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    2,099
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1107
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Exactly, Fenster trollin'.

    Pac I guess you can say is a pick em fight - but Naz beating JMM?

    Top trollin' *CLAP CLAP CLAP*

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    The Edge Of Nowhere
    Posts
    25,138
    Mentioned
    951 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1387
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Althugz View Post
    Exactly, Fenster trollin'.

    Pac I guess you can say is a pick em fight - but Naz beating JMM?

    Top trollin' *CLAP CLAP CLAP*
    Starting a thread is not trolling. Posting pithy one liners and sarcastic emoticons ? That is trolling. I should know apparently I couldn't be more troll like if I lived under a bridge.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    8,466
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1401
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    When I first opened this thread I thought that maybe Fenster had gone about it in the wrong way. It was obviously too obvious.

    But no. Quite amusing.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    53
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    812
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    I like the thread. It feels like the boxing Taliban have been overthrown - you can say Naz beats Pac, without fear. Yay.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,308
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3106
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    No one can really right off Naz because he punched so hard. It could happen that he catches JMM and stops him as he has the power. However no one has stopped Marquez and he has been in the ring with Manny 4 times so he knows how to handle himself. He would probably have an easier time with Naz as the fight would be less intense than they are with Manny but he would have to concentrate on not get caught with the unusual punches that Naz threw. 80% likely that JMM would have won.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Los Scandalous, CA
    Posts
    30,802
    Mentioned
    51 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5023
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.








































    that is all.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    363
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    666
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    Marquez ducked Nas and rejected what would've been the highest purse of his career

    Prime Nas, who was hungry and focused and had yet to be limited by the chronic swelling problems he developed in his hands would've given Pac a fight.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    11,430
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2082
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    You think the 'chronic swelling problems' were just limited to his hands?

    You're right though, Marquez cherry picked all of his fights, he strikes me as the type of fighter who is fearful of a loss and who avoided the best, never seeking them and his legacy will always have a huge blemish on it for not fighting Naseem p4p the greatest hamed.

    I'm starting to lose count of the ammount of Frank Warren fighters who have holes in their records because 'fighter X turned down a career high pay day'.

    I'm starting to suspect that there's maybe more to these fights not coming off than that, but then again Warren is so trustworthy...

  12. #12
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,779
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2027
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    Quote Originally Posted by TysonBomb View Post
    Marquez ducked Nas and rejected what would've been the highest purse of his career

    Prime Nas, who was hungry and focused and had yet to be limited by the chronic swelling problems he developed in his hands would've given Pac a fight.


    I honestly tried to find a vid of people supporting your (and Fenster's) theory, but this is the closest I could come up with.



  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3124
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    @TitoFan - You need a video? For fucks sake talk about denial (how many times?)

    Here's the same HBO guys confirming Marquez ducked Naz (@AdamGB - Frank Warren had nothing to do with Naz at this stage). All four turned down huge career high paydays.

    Last edited by Fenster; 12-13-2012 at 03:37 PM.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,779
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2027
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    It took you over an hour to take the bait.
    I'm somewhat disappointed.


  15. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3124
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-Naz - we now have definitve proof. Fact.

    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    It took you over an hour to take the bait.
    I'm somewhat disappointed.

    Well I can't react to things I haven't seen.

    It actually took me about 30 seconds to provide the uninitiated with the truth.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Further proof there are too many titles
    By killersheep in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 01-11-2010, 03:08 PM
  2. No Proof That He's Guilty?
    By sanj16 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 01-06-2010, 12:02 AM
  3. Some proof against evolution
    By Von Milash in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-09-2007, 08:25 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing