Where do u place Morales Hamed Pacquiao Marquez barrera from each other?

[TitoFan]

OFFICIAL RESULTS ON NASEEM HAMED:

So far our distinguished voters have seen it this way on Hamed, from a list with 5 fighters:


5th place: 6 voters

1st place: 1 voter

Notes:

1. One voter didn't even mention Hamed, which could be interpreted as a vote for 5th place.
2. One voter placed Hamed 6th, even adding a name to the list and further dropping Hamed.


The results speak for themselves, gentlemen.








Yes......... I'm afraid we're all wrong.

Three more votes....... three more Hameds in 5th place. Update as follows:


5th place: 9 voters

1st place: 1 voter


With one "no mention" and one 6th place.

No middle ground with Naz as far as that list is concerned.

the fact that people who are also the voters are so happy that Naz is in last , deems the results of the "poll" unreliable on the basis that the opinions of the votes are less than objective

Don't shoot the messenger...... just saying it like it is.


BTW... you confirmed my bolded statement above. No middle ground. You and Fenster have him 1st on the list. The rest of the civilized world as we know it has him last.

[erics44]

OFFICIAL RESULTS ON NASEEM HAMED:

So far our distinguished voters have seen it this way on Hamed, from a list with 5 fighters:


5th place: 6 voters

1st place: 1 voter

Notes:

1. One voter didn't even mention Hamed, which could be interpreted as a vote for 5th place.
2. One voter placed Hamed 6th, even adding a name to the list and further dropping Hamed.


The results speak for themselves, gentlemen.








Yes......... I'm afraid we're all wrong.

Three more votes....... three more Hameds in 5th place. Update as follows:


5th place: 9 voters

1st place: 1 voter


With one "no mention" and one 6th place.

No middle ground with Naz as far as that list is concerned.

the fact that people who are also the voters are so happy that Naz is in last , deems the results of the "poll" unreliable on the basis that the opinions of the votes are less than objective

Don't shoot the messenger...... just saying it like it is.


BTW... you confirmed my bolded statement above. No middle ground. You and Fenster have him 1st on the list. The rest of the civilized world as we know it has him last.

further evidence that your vote is unreliable

[TitoFan]

OFFICIAL RESULTS ON NASEEM HAMED:

So far our distinguished voters have seen it this way on Hamed, from a list with 5 fighters:


5th place: 6 voters

1st place: 1 voter

Notes:

1. One voter didn't even mention Hamed, which could be interpreted as a vote for 5th place.
2. One voter placed Hamed 6th, even adding a name to the list and further dropping Hamed.


The results speak for themselves, gentlemen.








Yes......... I'm afraid we're all wrong.

Three more votes....... three more Hameds in 5th place. Update as follows:


5th place: 9 voters

1st place: 1 voter


With one "no mention" and one 6th place.

No middle ground with Naz as far as that list is concerned.

the fact that people who are also the voters are so happy that Naz is in last , deems the results of the "poll" unreliable on the basis that the opinions of the votes are less than objective

Don't shoot the messenger...... just saying it like it is.


BTW... you confirmed my bolded statement above. No middle ground. You and Fenster have him 1st on the list. The rest of the civilized world as we know it has him last.

further evidence that your vote is unreliable

Ah-ah-ah.... the numbers speak for themselves.
I did not coerce, persuade, bribe, or in any way, shape or form try to influence the voting.
Thus, the validity of the vote stands.

[Fenster]

You and Fenster have him 1st on the list. The rest of the civilized world as we know it has him last.

There is no right or wrong answer to the question posed.

Therefore, your poll also indicates that two people - Fenster and Eric - are innovative free-thinking boxing intellectuals and nine people are mundane blatant haters. Fact.

[TitoFan]

You and Fenster have him 1st on the list. The rest of the civilized world as we know it has him last.

There is no right or wrong answer to the question posed.

Therefore, your poll also indicates that two people - Fenster and Eric - are innovative free-thinking boxing intellectuals and nine people are mundane blatant haters. Fact.

Uhh... refer to previous post.

[Fenster]

You and Fenster have him 1st on the list. The rest of the civilized world as we know it has him last.

There is no right or wrong answer to the question posed.

Therefore, your poll also indicates that two people - Fenster and Eric - are innovative free-thinking boxing intellectuals and nine people are mundane blatant haters. Fact.

Uhh... refer to previous post.

Uhh... you refer to the previous post.

Naz haters have zero validity.

I'm afraid you are simply not qualified to vote let alone conduct a poll. Fact.

[TitoFan]

You and Fenster have him 1st on the list. The rest of the civilized world as we know it has him last.

There is no right or wrong answer to the question posed.

Therefore, your poll also indicates that two people - Fenster and Eric - are innovative free-thinking boxing intellectuals and nine people are mundane blatant haters. Fact.

Uhh... refer to previous post.

Uhh... you refer to the previous post.

Naz haters have zero validity.

I'm afraid you are simply not qualified to vote let alone conduct a poll. Fact.

Lighten up.


These are only partial results.
We still haven't gotten Naz's mum or other relatives to weigh in on the matter.
50/50 chance they won't have him 5th.

[AdamGB]

You and Fenster have him 1st on the list. The rest of the civilized world as we know it has him last.

There is no right or wrong answer to the question posed.

Therefore, your poll also indicates that two people - Fenster and Eric - are innovative free-thinking boxing intellectuals and nine people are mundane blatant haters. Fact.

Hitler wasn't crazy... The rest of the world was!