Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 28 of 28

Thread: Warren: Froch-Kessler is good, but Froch-Cleverly is better

Share/Bookmark
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    947
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Warren: Froch-Kessler is good, but Froch-Cleverly is better

    Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    clev doesnt really have any massive fight options other than bellew and the time probably isnt right for the rematch

    what else is frank gonna do to try and get a big fight
    Dawson, Hopkins, Cloud, Shumanov, Pascal, Campillo? Maybe call out a decent Light-Heavyweight?

    I like Cleverly. He was progressing nicely but his opposition has gotten worse since winning the belt. Frank needs to stop talking and start making decent fights. You can't harp on about Nathan being ready for the best and then sign to fight Tom Karpency. Saying Froch will duck Cleverly though is absolutely laughable. Froch is levels above him, and his opposition is on a higher level than Nathan. Plus Froch will make alot more money elsewhere.

    Why wouldn't time by right for the Bellew rematch? Seriously, what else has he got going on?
    and on clev v bellew, i am of the opinion it would be better when after bellew progresses a little bit more

    although if the fight happened now i would definately be watching
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3117
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Warren: Froch-Kessler is good, but Froch-Cleverly is better

    Since the Bellew fight, which he arguably lost, Cleverly has fought Tommy Karpency and Shawn Hawk. Two of the WORST "world" title defenses of all-time.

    Clev is the one that needs to progress a bit.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    947
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Warren: Froch-Kessler is good, but Froch-Cleverly is better

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Since the Bellew fight, which he arguably lost, Cleverly has fought Tommy Karpency and Shawn Hawk. Two of the WORST "world" title defenses of all-time.

    Clev is the one that needs to progress a bit.
    progress in terms of ability perhaps

    in terms of rankings / standings there is a bit of a gap in clevs favour

    plus im not sure how edison miranda would fair against clevs last 2 defences, yeah they were shit names but miranda isnt the fighter he was
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Birmingham, UK
    Posts
    6,156
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1408
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Warren: Froch-Kessler is good, but Froch-Cleverly is better

    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    clev doesnt really have any massive fight options other than bellew and the time probably isnt right for the rematch

    what else is frank gonna do to try and get a big fight
    Dawson, Hopkins, Cloud, Shumanov, Pascal, Campillo? Maybe call out a decent Light-Heavyweight?

    I like Cleverly. He was progressing nicely but his opposition has gotten worse since winning the belt. Frank needs to stop talking and start making decent fights. You can't harp on about Nathan being ready for the best and then sign to fight Tom Karpency. Saying Froch will duck Cleverly though is absolutely laughable. Froch is levels above him, and his opposition is on a higher level than Nathan. Plus Froch will make alot more money elsewhere.

    Why wouldn't time by right for the Bellew rematch? Seriously, what else has he got going on?
    he has tried and failed with more than one of those fighters

    clev v froch would generate lots of pounds

    why not try?
    For Cleverly it would. Froch can make alot more money fighting Super-Middleweights.

    Also, he has only tried to secure a Hopkins fight. Again, it does nothing for Hopkins beating Cleverly because he hasn't proved a damn thing.

    Also, Boxrec has Bellew higher in the world rankings.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3117
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Warren: Froch-Kessler is good, but Froch-Cleverly is better

    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Since the Bellew fight, which he arguably lost, Cleverly has fought Tommy Karpency and Shawn Hawk. Two of the WORST "world" title defenses of all-time.

    Clev is the one that needs to progress a bit.
    progress in terms of ability perhaps

    in terms of rankings / standings there is a bit of a gap in clevs favour

    plus im not sure how edison miranda would fair against clevs last 2 defences, yeah they were shit names but miranda isnt the fighter he was
    Clev has never fought a single fighter that has fought for a "world" title let alone won one. Karpency just got destroyed in 7.

    Miranda, although past his best, is the best opponent either has faced.
    Last edited by Fenster; 01-03-2013 at 03:34 PM.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3117
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Warren: Froch-Kessler is good, but Froch-Cleverly is better

    By the way - I too would love to see Froch step-up and muller Cleverly. But everyone knows Warren is only calling him out because he knows the fight wont happen, Froch clearly has far bigger options.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    947
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Warren: Froch-Kessler is good, but Froch-Cleverly is better

    Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    clev doesnt really have any massive fight options other than bellew and the time probably isnt right for the rematch

    what else is frank gonna do to try and get a big fight
    Dawson, Hopkins, Cloud, Shumanov, Pascal, Campillo? Maybe call out a decent Light-Heavyweight?

    I like Cleverly. He was progressing nicely but his opposition has gotten worse since winning the belt. Frank needs to stop talking and start making decent fights. You can't harp on about Nathan being ready for the best and then sign to fight Tom Karpency. Saying Froch will duck Cleverly though is absolutely laughable. Froch is levels above him, and his opposition is on a higher level than Nathan. Plus Froch will make alot more money elsewhere.

    Why wouldn't time by right for the Bellew rematch? Seriously, what else has he got going on?
    he has tried and failed with more than one of those fighters

    clev v froch would generate lots of pounds

    why not try?
    For Cleverly it would. Froch can make alot more money fighting Super-Middleweights.

    Also, he has only tried to secure a Hopkins fight. Again, it does nothing for Hopkins beating Cleverly because he hasn't proved a damn thing.

    Also, Boxrec has Bellew higher in the world rankings.
    warren is cleverlys promoter
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    947
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Warren: Froch-Kessler is good, but Froch-Cleverly is better

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Since the Bellew fight, which he arguably lost, Cleverly has fought Tommy Karpency and Shawn Hawk. Two of the WORST "world" title defenses of all-time.

    Clev is the one that needs to progress a bit.
    progress in terms of ability perhaps

    in terms of rankings / standings there is a bit of a gap in clevs favour

    plus im not sure how edison miranda would fair against clevs last 2 defences, yeah they were shit names but miranda isnt the fighter he was
    Clev has never fought a single fighter that has fought for a "world" title let alone won one. Karpency just got destroyed in 7.

    Miranda, although past his best, is the best opponent either has faced.
    im not so sure about miranda being the best fighter either has faced

    hes the biggest name but i think there are one or two on cleverlys record who would probably handle him nowadays

    against bellew miranda was just shit

    p.s. it sounds like i am shouting for clev over bellew, i prefer bellew and would suport him in a rematch

    i am just saying warren is just doing his job and promoting his fighter
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Birmingham, UK
    Posts
    6,156
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1408
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Warren: Froch-Kessler is good, but Froch-Cleverly is better

    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post

    i am just saying warren is just doing his job and promoting his fighter
    He isn't doing a good job though as most will see this for what it really is. Fighting tomato cans who haven't done anything is not really doing anything for Clev's career. Fighting Miranda, a well known named opponent gets Bellew alot of attention. Eddie Hearn is doing his job promoting his fighter, because Bellew lost to Clev, doesn't have a belt and yet most people rank Bellew higher. How does that work?

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    947
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Warren: Froch-Kessler is good, but Froch-Cleverly is better

    Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post

    i am just saying warren is just doing his job and promoting his fighter
    He isn't doing a good job though as most will see this for what it really is. Fighting tomato cans who haven't done anything is not really doing anything for Clev's career. Fighting Miranda, a well known named opponent gets Bellew alot of attention. Eddie Hearn is doing his job promoting his fighter, because Bellew lost to Clev, doesn't have a belt and yet most people rank Bellew higher. How does that work?
    you are probably right

    bellew has done a lot more since they fought

    i dont think theres anything wrong with calling out froch tho
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Birmingham, UK
    Posts
    6,156
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1408
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Warren: Froch-Kessler is good, but Froch-Cleverly is better

    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post

    i am just saying warren is just doing his job and promoting his fighter
    He isn't doing a good job though as most will see this for what it really is. Fighting tomato cans who haven't done anything is not really doing anything for Clev's career. Fighting Miranda, a well known named opponent gets Bellew alot of attention. Eddie Hearn is doing his job promoting his fighter, because Bellew lost to Clev, doesn't have a belt and yet most people rank Bellew higher. How does that work?
    you are probably right

    bellew has done a lot more since they fought

    i dont think theres anything wrong with calling out froch tho
    There is when it isn't serious and it's just attention grabbing. Warren is critical of Froch for looking to fight Kessler instead of Cleverly, yet he couldn't fight Cleverly now because Nathan has to fight Krasniqi or he'll be stripped. It's all well and good calling someone out but if they don't fight you, you've got to go out and fight someone decent or the fans will see you as a fraud. Anthony Mundine is the ultimate example of this.

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,562
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    947
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Warren: Froch-Kessler is good, but Froch-Cleverly is better

    Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post

    i am just saying warren is just doing his job and promoting his fighter
    He isn't doing a good job though as most will see this for what it really is. Fighting tomato cans who haven't done anything is not really doing anything for Clev's career. Fighting Miranda, a well known named opponent gets Bellew alot of attention. Eddie Hearn is doing his job promoting his fighter, because Bellew lost to Clev, doesn't have a belt and yet most people rank Bellew higher. How does that work?
    you are probably right

    bellew has done a lot more since they fought

    i dont think theres anything wrong with calling out froch tho
    There is when it isn't serious and it's just attention grabbing. Warren is critical of Froch for looking to fight Kessler instead of Cleverly, yet he couldn't fight Cleverly now because Nathan has to fight Krasniqi or he'll be stripped. It's all well and good calling someone out but if they don't fight you, you've got to go out and fight someone decent or the fans will see you as a fraud. Anthony Mundine is the ultimate example of this.
    i am sure if froch said yes lets have it clev would fight him

    its just very unlikely
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    3,388
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    792
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Warren: Froch-Kessler is good, but Froch-Cleverly is better

    Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    clev doesnt really have any massive fight options other than bellew and the time probably isnt right for the rematch

    what else is frank gonna do to try and get a big fight
    Dawson, Hopkins, Cloud, Shumanov, Pascal, Campillo? Maybe call out a decent Light-Heavyweight?

    I like Cleverly. He was progressing nicely but his opposition has gotten worse since winning the belt. Frank needs to stop talking and start making decent fights. You can't harp on about Nathan being ready for the best and then sign to fight Tom Karpency. Saying Froch will duck Cleverly though is absolutely laughable. Froch is levels above him, and his opposition is on a higher level than Nathan. Plus Froch will make alot more money elsewhere.

    Why wouldn't time by right for the Bellew rematch? Seriously, what else has he got going on?
    Bute.
    You say tomato,
    ‘n I say …… it correctly.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Warren on Froch/ Calzaghe and Kessler...
    By THE PHILOSOPHER in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 12-02-2012, 08:51 PM
  2. Replies: 22
    Last Post: 09-05-2012, 06:11 PM
  3. Froch talks Bute,Ward & why he wont fight Cleverly
    By porkypara in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03-21-2012, 03:40 PM
  4. Froch vs Miranda/lacy or maybe cleverly?
    By Dropanuke in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 03-28-2011, 03:46 PM
  5. Replies: 23
    Last Post: 05-12-2009, 08:41 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing