But you're saying that those wins were better than Floyd's wins. Not only are you putting Glen Kelly in the same sentence as guys like Ricky Hatton, Shane Mosley and Miguel Cotto, you're insinuating that he was a BETTER win than those guys, which is possibly the craziest thing I've ever heard on this forum.

I've defended Roy's opposition for almost 10 years, and even I never had the audacity to argue that Glen Kelly was a meaningful win. The guy was never even a world champ.

I don't see how Mike Tyson belongs in the conversation. Roy Jones went 15 years into his career before he truely lost a fight. Floyd is into his 17th year without a loss, and regardless of what his haters think, he's fought some incredible fighters.

Mike Tyson had 5 or 6 great years then went to jail and turned into a freakshow. He doesn't belong in a p4p greatness discussion with guys like Roy Jones and Floyd Mayweather.