You don't need to switch hit to fight a southpaw, so I do not see how this would be an issue.
With the rare exception, southpaws are weaker than orthodox fighters.
 |
|
|
|
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Forum P4P Champ
Array
Re: Tyson vs a southpaw
You don't need to switch hit to fight a southpaw, so I do not see how this would be an issue.
With the rare exception, southpaws are weaker than orthodox fighters.
Forum P4P Champ
Array
Re: Tyson vs a southpaw
Cooney was a converted southpaw.
change me
Array
Re: Tyson vs a southpaw
Yup. Corbett, Basilio, Oscar and Cotto are a dew others.Originally Posted by THE PHILOSOPHER
Super Moderator
Array
Re: Tyson vs a southpaw
Virgill Hill must have been one as well.Yup. Corbett, Basilio, Oscar and Cotto are a dew others.
Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.
change me
Array
Re: Tyson vs a southpaw
Virgill Hill must have been one as well.Yup. Corbett, Basilio, Oscar and Cotto are a dew others.
Indeed he was
Consistent are the dead
Array
Re: Tyson vs a southpaw
I apologize, I created this thread then abandoned it!
I shall pick a post and reply to it now. Not because I want to but because I have a moral duty as a thread starter!
You say tomato,
‘n I say …… it correctly.
change me
Array
Re: Tyson vs a southpaw
Who said you had to switch hit to fight a southpaw?
That statement has no basis in fact.With the rare exception, southpaws are weaker than orthodox fighters
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks