Quote Originally Posted by THE PHILOSOPHER View Post
In this very thread @THE PHILOSOPHER is claiming Solis is better than Briggs and Rahman. Wlad has never even fought Solis, so if he is such a worthy challenger, then surely the no.1 of this era would have fought him? No but his brother did. Just like Wlad fought Haye but Vitali didn't. Vitali fought Adamek but Wlad didn't. Wlad fought Chagaev but Vitali didn't. Vitali fought Arreola but Wlad didn't.
I never stated Wlad has fought Solis! I only mentioned him when other posters brought VK into the thread discussion.

And yes Solis is way better than Briggs ever was.
The point is - you mentioned Solis as a good win for this era, however, the supposed no.1 didn't beat him his brother did.

The division has been diluted.