Statistics show that crime is falling but that is more to do with manipulation of figures than reality.
Crime is costing too much for the state. It costs over £40,000 a year to keep a person in prison. The 85,000 prisoners are at full capacity. They have instructed courts not to send them into prison unless they are highly dangerous. Police have introduced community resolutions which have resulted in less convictions in courts which is why crime is down.
Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.
I think the reason why crime is so high in England is because it is devoid. The family unit is largely the key and that is something which is empty. We have families which either have no father or have two parents both in work and that is useless. There is no role model or no time to care for the kid and all the government cares about is increasing efficiency and that means importing people. The total result is something horrible. England is simply not a nice place to live and especially in an urban area.
1. Crime is not SO HIGH in England
2. Thanks for the parenting advice but it is about as welcome as one on marital fidelity from an orange gagging Tory boy
3. The Government does not import people they move about in a place of free enterprise called Europe, today I had the pleasure of working with one who kicks the ass of every Englishman within 400 miles and charges way more. Go Figure.
4.The total result is a more multifaceted population with less 70's moustaches, rampant racism and general wife/children beating.
5. Therefore England is a wonderful place to live and living in the second largest city on the south coast I do not recognise the Urban hell hole you describe.
Crime is down and statistics can tell you anything you want to hear.
Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.
Whatever could cause that?
WELFARE perhaps? I know it has obliterated the very idea of a two parent household in the African-American community in the US....but hey so what if the "War on Poverty" did more harm than good. the intentions were good & that's all that matters. Government CAN be everything to you...if you just submit to it. I'm quite sure England has suffered these results for similar reasons.
The "War on Poverty" has done the most damage to that community
In 1963, 77% of black children were born to families with both a father and a mother. Today, nearly 70% of black children are born out of wedlock.
Children born into single parent homes are:
* More than twice as likely to be arrested for a juvenile crime
* Three times more likely to end up in jail by the time they reach age 30
* Twice as likely to be treated for emotional and behavioral problems
* Roughly twice as likely to be suspended or expelled from school
* A third more likely to drop out before completing high school
* Girls from single-parent homes are more than twice as likely to have a child without being married, thereby repeating the negative cycle for another generation.
* Children living in single parent homes are 50 percent more likely to experience poverty as adults when compared to children from intact married homes.
And WELFARE has caused that because the Government becomes the "Baby Daddy"
As Economist Thomas Sowell has pointed out, the war on poverty has been able to accomplish what slavery, Jim Crow Laws, and other forms of discrimination has not: it has largely destroyed the black family. Roughly 40.2% of all prisoners in the United States are Black men so just allow that to sink in for a second.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks