Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Array
I find it ironic how a couple of the guys on here who obviously dont like Americans much, are fighting for you all to disarm yourselves. You'd think they'd saying; "yeah go on, buy more guns, make it even easier to get them, so you can all have one.".
Instead they are saying it for one reason,to stop innocents getting killed by freaks in the future.
So whats more important? I say disarming the freaks and preventing more from arming themselves.
You need stricter vetting and stricter gun laws in regards to who.
Seriously what else can you do to stop innocents being continually plowed down?
What is your answer to the problem, or is there no problem in your mind?
Array
1. We don't have a president in England
2. We don't have a major problem with gun crime in England
3. This is a thread built on the false premise that crime is SO HIGH in England.
4. Blunt objects are red herrings as demonstrated by the lovely red interactive graph I found.
5.Your points are pointless because this is not a thread about America, Guns. Obama or a constitutional amendment that allows for the arming of militias.
Why not include pistols, smgs, machine pistols etc?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks