Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 20

Thread: Speed cameras A deterrent or a cash cow?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    South Korea
    Posts
    5,575
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1247
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Speed cameras A deterrent or a cash cow?

    A few years ago we had a lot of them in urban areas but when citizens started bringing them up at city/county meetings it became clear it was not meant as a deterrent but rather a means to raise revenue. Compound that with people realizing that the "ticket" was not an actual court ordered fine and could be ignored the legal challenges pretty much finished it off. Thankfully we aren't so much a fascist nation that we couldn't throw off this big brother racket.
    Most bad government has grown out of too much government. Thomas Jefferson

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    North Wales
    Posts
    9,844
    Mentioned
    392 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    980
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Speed cameras A deterrent or a cash cow?

    Trouble is with a speeding fine over here, comes 3 points if you accumulate 12 point in a 3 year period
    you are banned off the road, depending on the of offense you may have to retake your driving test.
    You may have to pass a advance driving test, to get back on the road.
    Last edited by Dia bando; 03-10-2013 at 07:19 PM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Up in the attic
    Posts
    26,468
    Mentioned
    448 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4191
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Speed cameras A deterrent or a cash cow?

    Yeah we got the points off thing too. Around schools times in school zones its 40 kilometers or about 15 mph now thats a good thing.

    Cops should sit there all morning and make certain but they dont, they are at the front of the freeway getting dudes doing 110 instead of 100.

    Meanwhile the odd chick in a big four wheel drive blasts through the school crossing zone looking at herself in the mirror and gets away with it.

    Im all for spraying the lenses and writing warning signs. Ive put signs up the bend before the cops once, years ago, time to start again .
    Hidden Content " border="0" />

    I can explain it.
    But I cant understand it for you.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,571
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    940
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Speed cameras A deterrent or a cash cow?

    100% there to make money.

    Just like adding tax to alcohol is supposed to act as a deterrent. Blatant lies.

    There are 3 relatively new things on the road that annoy me. Speed camera I have come to accept and avoid, these annoy the fuckwich out of me:

    Average Speed Cameras
    They clock your number plate using one of many cameras, then once you have left the final camera, they average your speed and fine you if it was over the limit. This means people crawling along perfectly good straights on dual carriage ways.

    Bus Lane Cameras
    If you should stray into a bus lane, even if its empty, is safe to do so and follows the natural racing line to where you want to go. Bam! Fine in the post. Even if you are helping to cause a jam in the lane you are, exiting into the empty stretch of road (which if everyone could do it there wouldn't be half as much traffic) you still get fined. It's not as if buses are hard to spot before you nip in the lane quickly to get to a junction shortly up the road.

    Camera Cars
    These little fuckers drive around with a camera on top. They scan and snap and catch loads of people. Bus bays, yellows etc. all without stoping. Drive and snap! Bastards!

    Ones like this

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Up in the attic
    Posts
    26,468
    Mentioned
    448 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4191
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Speed cameras A deterrent or a cash cow?

    I think a five foot piece of pipe swung would remove that camera clean off that car. Or spray paint the lenses .

    We havent got them here yet.
    Hidden Content " border="0" />

    I can explain it.
    But I cant understand it for you.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    McAllen, Texas?
    Posts
    5,505
    Mentioned
    177 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1238
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Speed cameras A deterrent or a cash cow?

    Years ago I read an article about them in the LA Times, the red-light cameras. They started out putting them at intersections that had either a lot of crashes due to people running red lights, tickets, or complaints. Now, the company that monitors these cameras charges a pretty substantial fee, and the fee went up as the city added more cameras.
    But, at first, they were giving out a lot of tickets so it was a profitable venture. And they worked- fewer crashes, fewer people running red lights, which meant fewer tickets being given out. But the monitoring fee remained the same, so it was now a losing proposition.
    So the city started shortening the length of the amber light...thus encouraging people to run red lights, thereby increasing the likelihood of crashes and smashed pedestrians. All to generate more revenue.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Up in the attic
    Posts
    26,468
    Mentioned
    448 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4191
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Speed cameras A deterrent or a cash cow?

    Quote Originally Posted by greynotsoold View Post
    Years ago I read an article about them in the LA Times, the red-light cameras. They started out putting them at intersections that had either a lot of crashes due to people running red lights, tickets, or complaints. Now, the company that monitors these cameras charges a pretty substantial fee, and the fee went up as the city added more cameras.
    But, at first, they were giving out a lot of tickets so it was a profitable venture. And they worked- fewer crashes, fewer people running red lights, which meant fewer tickets being given out. But the monitoring fee remained the same, so it was now a losing proposition.
    So the city started shortening the length of the amber light...thus encouraging people to run red lights, thereby increasing the likelihood of crashes and smashed pedestrians. All to generate more revenue.
    Assholes,pack of rotten assholes!
    Hidden Content " border="0" />

    I can explain it.
    But I cant understand it for you.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-02-2008, 08:04 PM
  2. Speed cameras
    By X in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-05-2007, 08:23 PM
  3. Cameras for Sale
    By X in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-18-2006, 04:33 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing